To: ransomnote
I watched several youtube videos over the past few days where Lon Brunson was interviewed. He mentioned that IF the Supreme Court does not act and does nothing (which he doubts will happen), then the military will step in. Should the Supreme Court not take action to correct this, then they too, are guilty of violating their oath and will be dealt with. The Cabal is between a rock and a hard place which is exactly where they should be :).
1,168 posted on 1/1/2023, 7:46:32 PM by GYPSY286
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1153 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Hostage posted a very interesting thread based on article by a law professor. It isn’t very long. JUST the discussion about the case brought out the trolls. This case and just the idea and existence of it is very over the target - whether the SCOTUS uses it or not. They can’t afford to have us talking about it!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4119737/posts
.
This is as good a place as any to post this; there are varying opinions about this case, and only time will tell which opinion hits the target. From UncoverDC, a good investigative news site. Excerpts, to read the whole article click the link.
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/
The Truth About the Brunson Case
By Adam Carter / Tracy Beanz
This column isn’t going to earn anyone money—to the contrary—many of you will likely hate us for writing it. But the truth is the truth. The purpose is not to “create division” or call out other conservative “influencers” simply because we have differing opinions. We have all spent years watching blatant government corruption, constitutional rights being trampled, and elections stolen—all with no one being held accountable.
Understandably, there are many who are frightened, confused, and feeling desperate after witnessing all of this. They are hoping for a “hail mary” to come flying in that will restore the country to the constitutional republic—with equal justice under the law—that she was meant to be. And in their desperation, they are prone to cling to whatever appears promising that’ll make it happen.
Sadly, there are people out there who will exploit, profit from, or simply “grift” off that desperation by filling the need with false hope—or “hopium.” It appears, unfortunately, that Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (No. 22-380)—also known as “The Brunson Case”—pending before the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS), is just such an example.
Where the Case Really Stands
First, we need to dispel some misunderstandings about the status of the case. It is not “scheduled for a hearing” before SCOTUS. So far, it is simply a petition for a writ of certiorari that’s been scheduled for conference. All that requires is filling out an online application and paying a filing fee.
Constitutional attorney Robert Barnes—a member of the Supreme Court Bar who has filed countless petitions for cert and made oral arguments in front of SCOTUS a number of times—explained the process for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari and how the petition is considered by the SCOTUS justices and their clerks on a recent Livestream with Viva Frei.
[video at link]
As Barnes noted above, every justice claims they read every single petition for cert filed with the court, but that claim is very much in doubt. SCOTUS justices employ clerks who read and vet all the petitions ahead of time. The clerks are very familiar with the judicial philosophy of the justice they work for and what legal arguments they would be interested in discussing. It is believed—based on what court insiders have described about the inner workings of the court—only the ones with merit are ever passed along and briefed by the clerks to the justices themselves. Justices simply don’t have time to read each and every one of the thousands of petitions that get filed with the SCOTUS every year.
Further, as independent journalist and podcaster Just Human noted on Truth Social, “only 20-25% of the petitions distributed for a given conference are actually discussed”.
he other 75-80% of petitions are denied and discarded—likely without the justices ever reading them or even being aware they exist.
As noted on both the SCOTUS docket and Brunson website, the Dept. of Justice (DOJ) waived its right to respond to the petition at all.
Somehow, this is being spun by proponents as a good sign for the petition. The lawsuit is so solid that DOJ is simply unable to mount any kind of defense against it. Does that actually make sense to anyone? The highly-politicized Merrick Garland DOJ is just going to throw up its hands and allow SCOTUS to unilaterally remove the entire Democratic party power base from elected federal office without so much as making an argument? And do so in a case that has been dismissed with ease at every level below SCOTUS? Does that really make sense to anyone?!? It’s absurd, almost beyond the point of comprehension. It’s nonsense.
As also noted by Barnes, the only reason that would happen is because the DOJ does not even feel the need to respond because the lawsuit has no merit whatsoever. If the court thought there was any chance—any chance at all—that the justices would vote to hear the case, they would reach out and request a response from the DOJ. The fact that neither the DOJ nor the court thought a response was necessary is the clearest sign that this case is going nowhere.
Merits Of The Case
We have read the lawsuit filed by the Brunson brothers. In our honest opinion, it does not seem to have any basis in constitutional law. Frankly speaking—as found by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in their dismissal—it’s “frivolous.”
[Long and detailed article, many legal/Constitutional cititaions, and well worth readinG]