Posted on 12/21/2022 6:41:01 PM PST by grundle
Chads? Hell, hang the lot of them!
Because Maricopa County is corrupt
Can anyone be hung for treason?
The voter centers without working machines:
59 were in solid red districts
2 were in lean red districts
4 were in lean blue districts
5 were in solid blue districts.
Actual Voter Suppression!!!
In short..they were all printed in a McCain machine.
Seriously, we will find that the McCain criminal cabal is in on this with the nazicRATS.
Ping
The Left attacks the voting process on all fronts, No stone is unturned, and tampering with hardware to achieve a fraudulent result is de rigueur.
The forensic analysis done in Antrim County in Michigan after the 2020 election showed that in various precincts in the county, 68% of scanned ballots failed to be read (with a failure rate of 90% in at least one county) and the failed scanned ballot images had to be shunted to an adjudication queue, where humans had to manually view them and assign them to various candidates.
If my memory serves me correctly, the critical log files showing the adjudication process (what logged in user adjudicated what votes, for whom, and at what date and time) on the Dominion servers were...gone. Missing. Deleted.
But they did not delete the log file that showed the optical scanning errors. (They probably didn’t know it was there, or thought it was unimportant)
And in the log file on the scanning process, they could see the results clearly for successful and unsuccessful scan attempts, resulting in the failed scanned ballots being shunted into the adjudication queue. That gave them the 68% failure rate.
The Federal Election Commission allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008 percent for computerized voting systems.
Furthermore, the cause was found to be anything ranging from gunk on the lens of the optical scanner (which as anyone knows who has to work with a lot of document scanners as I have...can happen) to the lens of the scanner being out of adjustment.
I found that “out of adjustment” reason to be interesting. Hardware adjustment, or software adjustment? They did not specify. But suspicious minds would wonder about that. If there is a calibration file for a printer (especially very expensive, purpose-built, high end document scanners such as these) then someone could manually edit that calibration file. Even edit it remotely.
Obviously, a hardware setting such as a manual adjustment screw which would require manipulation and then verification via testing that the optics were back within specifications would be harder to do, but...not impossible.
That would render the optics unable to correctly read the scanned document, resulting in a failure.
well ok but if the hand counted them then there is no fraud. However any process that is not auditable is on its face fraudulent. All election processes are not auditable, therefore they are all fraudulent.
Just a slight printing error, of no Consequences, nothing too see here, oh, oh look Bad Man orange’s tax returns!
p
HAHAHA!!!!!!
Not really. the people that tested the ballots and did the QA review of the paper are at fault. In my former job we would order pallets of check stock that had to be verified at the bank after printing test checks. It is called process controls. Government employees (not workers) have no idea how to do this type of verification. doesn’t matter what process is used. They can’t do it. smart people don’t work for these people.
That was exactly my experience. My son's ballot was so lightly printed along the edges, he had to fill them in with a felt marker before the machine would finally accept them. Ridiculous.
.
federal courts now have a reason to be involved. This is truly a 14th amendment. Violation. Besides felon hobbs is now ileligable to take the iath of office
Spoken like a good Democrat lackey
“NOW WE KNOW WHY – They INTENTIONALLY Used Wrong-Sized Ballots to Jam Machines on Election Day!”
Not exactly. The ballots did not jam the machines. The were incorrectly printed resulting in the ballots being rejected when scanned.
Note 'Runbeck'...
If we put the little weasely Gates election guy in a prison cell with a 300 pound killer who is gay, lets see how giggly he is then….
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.