And I’ll bet theyll still push it on everybody including children
People have been referring to the “vaccine” as the “clot shot” for several years now...and the FDA somehow just now figured this out? Boy they sure are slow.
Good thing they got total immunity...
Have they done a study on younger people?
“The new study states that the FDA “strongly believes the potential benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the potential risks of COVID-19 infection.” No evidence was cited in support of the belief.”
____________________________________________
To cite the evidence would be to cite incriminating evidence.
Whaaaaaaaaat?! What a surprise!
By my reckoning it is a ‘little too late’ for these studies about the adverse effects of the vaxx.
The jabs started two years ago on December 10, 2020. And now that somewhere around 70% of Americans have been jabbed once or more times, they are finally studying the side effects.
Since MRNA jabs were very experimental, the FDA and others should have been documenting side effects from the get-go.
“””About 25 million people receive the Medicare Fee-for-Service, but only about 17 million were vaccinated during the period of time studied.”””
From the report this is an interesting stat. In Florida something like 94% of the residents above age 65 have been jabbed.
Whereas, this study says across the USA only 68% of those above 65 have been jabbed.
Oh, it’s just the FDA.
Gotta trust pfizer & cdc.
/s
Yep. Killed my mom (stroke). But we already knew this.
The FDA finally gets a clue!
When is NPR going to broadcast this news?
Everyone knows that, that’s why they’ve had the side effects listed at the end of all the Covidjection commercials . . . . /sarc
I’ll put this in the NFS file
The cartoon at the link says it all.
BTW, if the truth offends, do NOT click.
DIC and ITP are not small things. Break out the lawyers! It’s past time.
Is The Donald still keeping quiet about his leadership on this? Complicit crimes are a little problem.
If you have never looked up the federal statute on EUAs…. You should. It’s an abuse of power and a crime to use them in the way they were used… with one exception.
So why isn’t anyone asking about the exception? Because they would rather be complicit in deaths of others than to be wrong.
And btw…. If these clots are not comprised of traditional components we cannot measure them in the lab or treat them well with traditional clot busters that are based on those components.
Another problem… iirc, Moderna had a higher dose. I know people who took both and te Moderna crowd had more tea yin’s.
Another problem…. We look for clots in the older group, but by the time you are symptomatic… your clots are big.
What about the people with small clots.. or clots in vital areas. Tie is my biggest concern with healthy people who can compensate. I wonder about the damage that is done.
And this will essentially halt all vaccine injections until the FDA can properly perform clinical trials and follow protocols to safely release the vaccine that doesn’t KILL. How convenient the government gave big pharma unconditional release of liability from injury.
Is it OK now for one to brag on FR that they didn’t get the clot shots, or will such a comment bring name calling like being a conspiracy theorist Qtard?