“his congenital disease is procoaguable and surgery especially extensive surgery for TEF and if they used bypass for congenital heart correction is incredibly procoaguable”
Then the doctors were negligent for using potentially tainted blood without first checking it for evidence of the vaccine that’s known to stay in the bloodstream for at least 2 weeks and is known for causing blood clots.
The doctors were not negligent. First, it bears note that the child appears to have had acute.postoperative blood loss anemia which happens in major surgery like this. Second negligence means a known violation of a standard of care. If any negligence exists blame the parents. They consented to surgery for their child in which there was a high likelihood of transfusion. They purportedly didn’t wait the few extra days for directed transfusion (which probably means none of the family were histocompatable or had blood antibodies making transfusion dangerous)
So if there is any negligence it’s on the parents.
The data you seem to want to hang your hat on is that there is definitive data to suggest that blood transfusion post vaccination either spreads spike protein (it does not) and if it did there would be ample evidence as millions of units are transfused a year
But here is what makes this theory laughable. Obviously nonclinicians have zero idea of blood transfusions. Thrombogenesis from COVID and to a lesser degree from vaccination comes from SIRS which triggers a complement mediated inflammatory response and activates the clotting cascade which has to go with factors. Blood transfusions are fractionated and as such the patient does not receive whole blood. Just the erythrocytes.
Even using google doctor which is generally inaccurate rjotjing that demonstrates spread via transfusion and erythrocytes are not the target of coronavirus nor its morphology of proteins.
The lkey doesn’t fit the lock.
This story complete with the fact that the cannot even determine if the therapy was given defies all reasonable standards. There can be no response because it is so far around the end as to any definitive evidence it literally is like reading gibberish.
But most of the crazy theories are just that to rational and intelligent thought. Gibberish.
Latches theory does not work in law nor science. You start with a faulty assumption and any statement downstream of that assumption cannot be fact.
Only negligence here is on the parents. Were they this afraid do the blood supply they should not have consented to surgery on their child which has a high likelihood of transfusion.
Taken on iota face the cold hard facts are that the parents are to blame for violating their bloods (even though they are wrong in their beliefs). They should have sought alternative treatments instead of trying to have their cake and eat it too.