The doctors were not negligent. First, it bears note that the child appears to have had acute.postoperative blood loss anemia which happens in major surgery like this. Second negligence means a known violation of a standard of care. If any negligence exists blame the parents. They consented to surgery for their child in which there was a high likelihood of transfusion. They purportedly didn’t wait the few extra days for directed transfusion (which probably means none of the family were histocompatable or had blood antibodies making transfusion dangerous)
So if there is any negligence it’s on the parents.
The data you seem to want to hang your hat on is that there is definitive data to suggest that blood transfusion post vaccination either spreads spike protein (it does not) and if it did there would be ample evidence as millions of units are transfused a year
But here is what makes this theory laughable. Obviously nonclinicians have zero idea of blood transfusions. Thrombogenesis from COVID and to a lesser degree from vaccination comes from SIRS which triggers a complement mediated inflammatory response and activates the clotting cascade which has to go with factors. Blood transfusions are fractionated and as such the patient does not receive whole blood. Just the erythrocytes.
Even using google doctor which is generally inaccurate rjotjing that demonstrates spread via transfusion and erythrocytes are not the target of coronavirus nor its morphology of proteins.
The lkey doesn’t fit the lock.
This story complete with the fact that the cannot even determine if the therapy was given defies all reasonable standards. There can be no response because it is so far around the end as to any definitive evidence it literally is like reading gibberish.
But most of the crazy theories are just that to rational and intelligent thought. Gibberish.
Good to know, thanks for posting.