More like you can't answer them, and are too small minded to admit it.
If anyone is getting "rekt" on this thread its ignorant dopes like you who shoot their mouth off but can't answer questions that expose their incompetence.
Nice try bucko.
I’m not taking the side of those who insisted on jab-contaminated blood.
But gassy *is*.
Again, you’re trying to make this “opposed to jabs” == “ superstitions peasant” opposed to modern technology.
But that isn’t what happened here
The parents followed the safe guidance of the MDs against their better wishes.
Their baby is now dead, and the hospital is disavowing any record of the child.
The *only* thong the parents disagreed on was the source of the jabs.
It was the hospital that screwed up—it’s not like the parents refused treatment and their baby died.
An it was the attending physicians and the hospital who blithely assured the parents that blood clots were rare. And then that the blood clot could be managed by blood thinners.
...and who were responsible for the MRSA, as the kid didn’t leave the premises after the operation and before the clots, right?
I’ll bet the amnesia doesn’t extend to the billing department.
Troll.
Was that some of your 'smoke', Mickety? Seemed a little nerdy to me. The nerd version of 'same to you but more of it'. Shirley you can do better.
#BringTheSmokeNerd