Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

The Congress’ first naturalization law, 1790 Act Naturalization Act, was found to be in error by key founders and framers such as Madison and thus on their instigation was totally repealed and replaced by the 1795 Naturalization Act which corrected the errors. No naturalization law since the 1790 erroneous one has ever mentioned the term “natural born Citizen” as Congress has no power under the U.S. Constitution or the laws of nature and Natural Law to create a “natural born Citizen”.


8 posted on 12/16/2022 4:47:06 PM PST by CDR Kerchner (natural born Citizen, natural law, Emer de Vattel, naturels, presidential, eligibility, kamalaharris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CDR Kerchner

“...as Congress has no power under the U.S. Constitution or the laws of nature and Natural Law to create a “natural born Citizen”.””

I have no clue as to what that means.

My point is that the term natural born is defined in the act. The framers put it in the Constitution as one of three requirements to be president of the United States, so it has pivotal meaning.


13 posted on 12/16/2022 4:51:29 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson