Posted on 12/06/2022 9:42:55 PM PST by qaz123
And if he does, the outlook is worse.
According to both the Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI), via Chairman Mark Warner, and the House Intelligence Committee (HPSCI) via Mike Turner, the Chinese social media platform TikTok represents a “national security risk” to the United States. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, soon to be the vice-presidential candidate for the DeSantis-Noem 2024 ticket, has also called TikTok a national security threat and banned it in the state. Now, think about that carefully.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
okay, but it seems like we’re inventing motives
If the DHS/gov't controls Twitter, why is the shift to "free speech" permitted?
That change casts doubt on this article's accuracy.
They are both turnaround guys who are attracted to opportunities to fix things--BIG things.
Though Trump and Musk are not coordinating their efforts (we don't even know if they know each other), they are unwittingly squeezing the Deep State in a pincer operation.
My comment was in response to the article's conclusion that the Deep State is still in control.
Good effin Grief yourself, dumbass.
Sheesh.
Nothing wrong with not reading the article, but then to flap your gums like you are an expert...
As they say, how a person behaves behind the anonymity of the internet tells you everything you need to know about their character.
As you said, "Good Grief!"
Hey, it's early and Freepers are waking up. Maybe you can go harass other people in an effort to pump up your delicate ego.
Yup. The phones are compromised even if the app is deleted. Need to issue new phones with a white list of approved apps that con be loaded onto them.
https://everphone.com/en/blog/whitelist-business-smartphone-apps/
Then the old phones should be bricked.
Nailed it!
Crime scene, indeed.
Why was complicit, former FBI lawyer James Baker still in the employ —and influence hierarchy—of Twitter/Musk ? Did he know ?
This scenario and developments lend a degree of credence to Sundance’s theory.
“he bought a crime scene..“
No, something is very wrong here. Elon has been in bed with the US government on other projects. He would have known about prior agreements and signed contracts.
The theory that fits the existing data is that Elon is there at the behest of the DHS to try to salvage the investment by releasing enough to make it gain respectability.
Still banned.
Now I’m wondering, if the ban is ever lifted, if I really want to go back...
Sarcastic? This 'Sundance' character is more in the 'delusional' category. He just makes it up as he goes.
I’m not voting for Desantis-Noem.
______________________
You may be late to the party pal, but you are not voting for anyone to be President. You are now living in the divided states of CHINA. They control who becomes our leader.
Presidential elections are dead. The best one can do is move to a free state, i.e. a red state where the elections are not corrupted. And your hatred for Noem tells me all I need to know. Please do not come to my free state of South Dakota.
Late to the party.
The Awan brothers were right here, in the U.S., on Hillary’s payroll.
The computer revolution’s permutations are occurring so quickly these days that to say ‘its over’ seems to defy logic.
Put simply, DHS is mitigating any consequential public exposure by controlling and feeding Mr. Musk selected information about prior Twitter operations.
This piece was published yesterday. I think this article, published late yesterday, might be relevant:
Elon Musk fires Twitter's general counsel and ex-fbi official James Baker
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.