Exactly where does the Constitution provide for that, and who, specifically, makes the decision that Biden is out and Trump is in? Because I don't think Biden and Harris are just going to leave voluntarily just because Trump asked them to.
...or to hold a second election.
The Constitution doesn't provide for that either unless we're taking about 2024. But in his second post, he said that steps must be taken "immediately", so it doesn't sound like he's talking about waiting until 2025 to take office.
Trump is asking for remedies that don't exist under the Constitution, and for which there is no mechanism to accomplish. How is that not the same as asking for at least a temporary suspension of the Constitution? I just don't see how to reconcile his proposed remedies with the argument that he thinks the Constitution should be followed.
Or is he just venting and not meaning for his points to be taken seriously?
“FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING” — United States Supreme Court (Ruling rendered in the 1878 case: United States versus Throckmorton)
* “Vitiates” in a legal context means negates, quashes, annuls, invalidates, revokes and abrogates
United States v. Throckmorton (98 U.S. 61) is an 1878 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on civil procedure, specifically res judicata, in cases heard at equity. A unanimous Court affirmed an appeal of a decision by the District Court for California upholding a Mexican-era land claim, holding that collateral estoppel bars untimely motions to set aside the verdict where the purportedly fraudulent evidence has already been considered and a decision reached. In the opinion it distinguished between that kind of fraud, which it called intrinsic, and extrinsic fraud, in which deceptive actions exterior to the proceeding prevented a party, or potential party, to the action from becoming aware of the possibility they could vindicate their rights in court.
Intrinsic fraud is an intentionally false representation that goes to the heart of what a given lawsuit is about, in other words, whether fraud was used to procure the transaction. (If the transaction was fraudulent, it probably does not have the legal status of a contract.) Intrinsic fraud is distinguished from extrinsic fraud (a/k/a collateral fraud) which is a deceptive means of keeping a person from discovering and/or enforcing legal rights. It is possible to have both intrinsic and extrinsic frauds.
Ipso facto, the outcome of a POTUS election that is rife with one-sided fraud and criminality is rendered null and void. Especially any result which saw the winner attain his or her victory through fraudulent means and/or criminal conduct is automatically canceled and invalid under the law.
The same U.S. Supreme Court ruling also determined that fraud vitiates contracts. An election is essentially a binding contract between the electorate and the elected. This indispensable social contract is irreparably broken through voter fraud as the public trust is profoundly violated.
He's just pushing the buttons of people to see what the reactions are. Mainly, he wants to see how many of his supporters would be willing to start a revolution over the 2020 election, which is data he would need to decide what he wants to do, or ask people to do, next. Who's willing to make the ultimate sacrifice, as that very well could be what a revolution results in. So he's measuring up his support, in the form of a potentially fatalistic rallying cry.
Second, he's also pushing the buttons of his opponents, to measure them up as well, in size and scope. He's forcing the issue, and making people choose a side, so that even people like me, who once supported him greatly, but had settled on being more on the fence and not supporting him for President unless he won the nomination, are starting to wonder if he should ever be President again, at all.
Why is he forcing the issue? Especially two years after the 2020 election, and even after the 2022 midterms? Likely because he is starting to see his chances in 2024 are starting to go down the tubes. Whether that is because, as his supporters would claim, we can't make it 2024 with the Democrats in control, or as his detractors would claim, he doesn't have a chance in hell of winning the general election. Either way, his recent actions appear to indicate that he himself has possibly realized that 2024 will not be the way he becomes President again, so a rehash of 2020 is his only hope. Which could require a literal scorched Earth approach, but before embarking on that, he needs to measure everything up.