[Gay State Conservative]

There are few Americans who support 2A more than me (yes,I am from Massachusetts) but I,like many (most?),think that there are some people who should be denied access to firearms...in some cases temporarily,in some permanently. I think that having been indicted for resisting a police officer might qualify for "temporary".

And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

[qwerty1234]

I agree, and recognize it can be abused (in either direction)- but just last week you have a guy , on video clear as day, walks into a bar and starts shooting at his ex-gf (before being jumped by other guys) - I have no problem taking away his guns while he is awaiting trial.

There has to be some common sense.

[T.B. Yoits]

I,like many (most?),think that there are some people who should be denied access to firearms...in some cases temporarily,in some permanently... And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

Yeah, we've heard all the self-absorbed and illogical opinions too, sadly even here on Free Republic.

Following your thinking, they shouldn't have access to automobiles, knives, illicit narcotics, bats, gasoline, pools, rope, wrenches, pipes, staircases, drain cleaner, their own fists, etc.

If they're not dangerous enough to lock up, indicting them is not cause to deprive them of their inalienable rights. Wait until your rights are stripped away based on a false accusation.

[NorthMountain]

indicted for resisting a police officer

I'm tired of clowns in funny costumes being treated as "super-citizens".

[BlackbirdSST]

And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

Yea yea. We've heard all of your stale crap as well, forever.

[zeugma]

And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

It's OK, we know you don't really support the second amendment.