[T.B. Yoits]

I,like many (most?),think that there are some people who should be denied access to firearms...in some cases temporarily,in some permanently... And all you Freepers who cry "no restrictions on gun ownership!" can save it....I've heard it all before.

Yeah, we've heard all the self-absorbed and illogical opinions too, sadly even here on Free Republic.

Following your thinking, they shouldn't have access to automobiles, knives, illicit narcotics, bats, gasoline, pools, rope, wrenches, pipes, staircases, drain cleaner, their own fists, etc.

If they're not dangerous enough to lock up, indicting them is not cause to deprive them of their inalienable rights. Wait until your rights are stripped away based on a false accusation.

[FreedomPoster]

You would think that with all the stories of scummy Soros DAs loose in the world people would have more sense, on that last. The example of the McKloskeys in St. Louis being prosecuted for defending themselves and their home from a mob comes to mind, but there are others.

[Gay State Conservative]

But that 18 year old was one heck of a man though!

Following your thinking, they shouldn't have access to automobiles, knives...

So you can't think of a *single* person who should be banned from driving at least for a while...or have access to a knife? Let me know where you live and I'll arrange for my crazy nephew to move next door to you. He just *loves* knives and very seldom takes his meds.

[Gay State Conservative]

Sorry about the “heck of a man” thing.It’s from a thread yesterday about an Australian Navy hero.