Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Montana_Sam

Thank you for the links.

The first one could be construed as non-natural, but the second one is definitely natural.

Even if the second one is man-made it does not signify any great leap from the creators of stonehenge i.e. neolithic hunter-gatherers.

This isn’t even the pyramid level (Chalcolithic) - that’s not to dismiss stonehenge as nothing, they are impressive, but they aren’t “civilizations” as in the sense of “civis” i.e. cities.


99 posted on 12/05/2022 6:18:55 AM PST by Cronos (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
You see what you want. That you would characterize the second link showing large stacked, blocks in the Urals as natural is puzzling. Large stone blocks in Russian Urals

The size of the blocks are revealed in other photos down the page:
"https://www.soulask.com/i-never-knew-that-russia-has-these-shocking-ancient-megaliths/"
I reject the notion that the wall of huge, stacked blocks depicted is "natural".
100 posted on 12/05/2022 10:42:26 AM PST by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson