It isn’t polite to discuss Ms. Abrams’ binders in public.
Posted on 11/30/2022 9:04:58 PM PST by weston
She’s gonna need a bigger binder!
I think the chances of her announcing she has tested positive for covid just went up significantly lol.
It isn’t polite to discuss Ms. Abrams’ binders in public.
What is that tapping noise?
exit’s in trouble again.
Nothing new.
:-D
This guy had the guts to speak from the heart about Balenciaga while his gutless co-hosts quaked in fear of having an Unapproved Opinion.
He ripped out his earpiece because he was being told to stop and he didn’t care.
Bravo.pic.twitter.com/YX00YZnN93— Rob Smith 🇺🇸 (@robsmithonline) December 2, 2022
Posted that earlier.
That’s ok, I can’t keep up either.
Noah’s Nightly Newsletter – 12-2-22
https://truthlion.com/noahs-nightly-newsletter-12-2-22/
* Full Thread: The Twitter Files Exposed, Part 1
* QUESTIONS SWIRLING: Jack Dorsey “Pizza” Email Deleted, Musk Trying To Defend Dorsey?
* Elon Musk BANS Ye…Now Ye Can Be Followed On Truth Social
* Senator Quits The Democratic Party!
Just thinking there must be a gazillion phone calls, texts, emails, etc. going around the dem camps tonight. THEY know what they’ve done, including the election rigging (2020 and 2022), the collusion with the media, big tech, big pharma, WEF, child sex trafficking, etc. They probably have communicated about so many things over DM on Twitter but can’t recall....it must be panic behind the scenes right now.
I just hope Musk didn’t make some deal with Cook in order to keep Twitter going....like NOT exposing some people for some things. I hope we get it ALL.
Good morning, lysie!
Two days in a row, 1st one up and in the dining car to chow down on your wonderful breakfast.
Many thanks for another winner!
Thank you for posting, Jane.
My question is why did Musk release this stuff late on a Friday night?
I thought that it was done at that time to try and kill the story or at least tamp down on it.
ya...too late to make the weekend talking heads agendas...
Good morning, lysie!
I love when it rains BACON on a breakfast meal!
Thank you!
There is panic in DC, as Q predicted long ago.
I think the avalanche of information has started.
And there is no stopping it now.
It is like the bottle has been uncorked, and the genie will never go back in.
An irreversible process has begun, and will proceed along multiple, simultaneous fronts from this point onward.
And now, Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming (NCSWIC).
We are living in historic times.
Far be it from me to EVER discuss Ms. Abrams binders, although she could use one---around that big,fat, election-denying mouth of hers.
Rather, we were discussing KJP, the intrepid, whirling-dervish WH press secretary, who could never--and I mean ever--be confused with Ms. Abrams in the binder department.
While I always enjoy your turn of the ankle, I am innocent of all charges, Your Honor.
Good morning, LG!
Quite the early bird, you are!
Musk tweeted last night that Twitter’s servers were going Warp 9, mean traffic was off the charts.
I think that all we have been waiting and praying for, has begun.
This story is huge, bigger than Watergate.
That the media will try to ignore it, will prove their comlicity to the normies.
Florida lawyer Jeff Childers’ take on the Brunson case, from the 12/2/22 Coffee and Covid email:
“I’ve been getting a lot of questions about a guy named Raland Brunson. Brunson filed a pro-se lawsuit a couple years ago against 388 (three hundred and thirty eight!) elected and appointed federal officials, including Joe Biden, originally asking a Utah state court to remove them all from office for sedition and treason. The gist of Brunson’s argument is that, since 100 congressmen wanted an investigation before certifying the 2020 election, and since the US Congress ignored their objections and certified anyway, the defendant congressmen “adhered to our enemies” and, because the certification vote was procured “by fraud,” they, Biden and everyone that he appointed should be promptly removed from office.
The first time someone asked me about the case, I took a quick look at the pro-se format and the extreme relief that was requested, plus the crazy high number of defendants, and opined it had a snowball’s chance. Move on. I didn’t pay any more attention to the case.
But now Brunson has managed to get a toenail into the Supreme Court somehow.
First, props to the three Brunson brothers, who are managing the case without lawyers, since they navigated the minefield of getting all 388 official defendants served under very difficult circumstances, like covid lockdowns and security, and because they have avoided making any number of rookie mistakes that would have let courts flush the case without dealing with the merits.
Just as I’d expect, the case history so far has amounted to very little. Unsurprisingly, the federal government successfully removed the case from Utah state court to federal court. Then the federal district court unsurprisingly dismissed Brunson, finding he lacked standing to bring the case because he failed to describe a “particularized” harm. To be fair, this was an easy way for the district court to flush the case without having to get into the facts. It’s it happens all the time, especially with these pro-se political cases.
Undeterred, Brunson appealed to the 10th Circuit, which sat on the case for a good while. In the meantime, the Brunson brothers found a fascinating strategy that involved a little-known and almost never used rule, and properly asked the Supreme Court to take the case as a matter of original jurisdiction, since it involved a national emergency, even though the 10th Circuit hadn’t yet ruled on the appeal.
It was a bold and clever move. More props to the Brunsons. It forced the 10th Circuit to quickly issue a decision, which unsurprisingly upheld the district court’s dismissal of the case. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court opened a case, which can now be found online. Opening the case is a good sign but it means nothing by itself. Even if the Court just plans to flush the case too, it had to open the case first, so it can be removed to the circular file.
According to a Zoom discussion they published this week on Bitchute, the understandably enthusiastic Brunson bothers reported that the Supreme Court clerk had contacted them, expressed interest in their case, and asked them to submit some additional materials. The Brunsons interpreted this as a sign suggesting that the Supreme Court intends to hear their case.
I’m not sure.
To be fair, I have limited Supreme Court experience in only a handful of cases. But in that limited experience, I’ve found the clerks at the Supreme Court to be universally smart, proactive, helpful and pleasant. So I’m not surprised that the Brunsons reported dealing with a knowledgeable and involved clerk. It would be wishful thinking to assume anything about the Court’s posture because of how the clerk sounded.
To be even more fair, the Brunsons were not just excited because of the clerk, but also because of some other, more technical developments in the case, like the government unexpectedly switching attorneys, or the government’s surprising decision to waive its right to respond to Brunson’s petition.
But there are multiple possible reasons for these things, and some of the possible reasons are NOT helpful, like maybe the government is so confident about what the court will do that it didn’t feel like it needs to respond.
Here’s the bottom line, for me. This is a massive “Hail Mary” case. It is unimaginable that, two years later, the Supreme Court would start removing elected officials from office just because Congress failed to investigate the 2020 elections. I literally can’t imagine how that could happen. Brunson has been dismissed by two courts already, or three if you count the state court who lost jurisdiction. The most likely result is the Supreme Court will dismiss the case too.
Still, kudos to the Brunsons for doing a technically terrific job, making it hard for the government to get rid of them, and for just reaching the Supreme Court at all. Normally, most cases (99%) are promptly rejected by the Court. I’m not getting my hopes up, but a miracle would certainly be welcome.
It will take a miracle.
If you want to keep an eye on developments, here’s a link to the Brunson case’s online docket on the Supreme Court’s website.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
