Posted on 11/27/2022 7:12:55 PM PST by Qiviut
[CHD note: this article was originally published on April 16, 2020.]
Dear Sanjay,
Last week, your CNN producer, Matthew Reynard, notified me that CNN is featuring me in a documentary about “vaccine misinformation”. As usual, Mr. Reynard did not point out a single factual assertion by me that was incorrect (I carefully source all of my statements about vaccines to government databases or peer-reviewed publications). CNN uses the term “vaccine misinformation” as a euphemism for any statement that departs from the Government / Pharma orthodoxy that all vaccines are safe, necessary, and effective for all people.
I have always admired you, Sanjay. Your obvious talents aside, you seem to be genuinely compassionate and to value integrity. Earlier in your career, you showed a courageous willingness to challenge Big Pharma’s vaccine orthodoxies. However, I respectfully point out that CNN and particularly you, Sanjay, are today among the most prolific broadcasters of “vaccine misinformation”. Over the last several years, I cannot recall seeing a single substantial CNN segment on vaccines that did not include easily verified factual misstatements. CNN’s recent special, “Pandemic”, was a showcase of erroneous assertions about the flu vaccine. Since I don’t like to think that you deliberately mislead the public—particularly about critical public health choices—I have taken the time to point out some of your most frequent errors.
I hope you will take time to read this. This critique has special relevance during the current coronavirus crisis, not to mention its important implications for the roles of government and press in a democracy. CNN and other media outlets treat CDC, NIH, and WHO pronouncements as infallible truths. In fact, regulatory capture has made these agencies subsidiaries of Big Pharma, and the lies that CDC has been telling us about flu are now muddying the debate over coronavirus.
1. CNN assertion: In your annual flu shot promotions, you routinely parrot CDC’s estimates of overall flu deaths which have ranged in recent years from 36,000 for the 1990-1991 flu season to 80,000 for the 2017-2018 flu season.
Fact: The HHS’s mortality and morbidity data—available on the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) website—show that CDC’s (and CNN’s) annual estimates are off by orders of magnitude.
NCHS data report the average number of mortalities attributable to influenza on death certificates is little more than 1,000. CDC devises its inflated estimate by deliberately conflating flu deaths with pneumonia deaths. This device is deceitful since most of these fatalities are unrelated to the flu (and therefore, impervious to flu vaccines). In 2005, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Editor, Dr. Peter Doshi, published a comprehensive rebuke of CDC’s annual ritual of exaggerating flu mortalities entitled “Dissecting CDC’s Deception: Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science?” Doshi accuses the CDC of purposefully inflating flu deaths to frighten the public into purchasing vaccines. To illustrate CDC’s chicanery, Doshi observed that CDC’s announced number of reported pneumonia and influenza deaths in 2001 at 62,034. Yet less than half of one percent of those were actually attributed to influenza. Furthermore, of the mere 257 cases that could reasonably be blamed on the flu in CDC’s mortality data, only 7 percent were laboratory confirmed cases of influenza. That’s 18 lab confirmed influenza cases out of 62,034 “pneumonia and influenza” deaths—or just 0.03 percent, according to HHS’s own National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
Subtracting pneumonia, the true number of influenza-associated deaths from 1979 to 2002 averaged 1,348, according to the NCHS data. CNN routinely reports figures forty times this number.
Dr. Doshi charges the CDC with deliberately lying about annual flu deaths to “[work] in manufacturers’ interest by conducting campaigns to increase flu vaccination”. He warns that “by arbitrarily linking flu with pneumonia, current data are statistically biased.”
By faithfully parroting CDC inflated numbers—with no due diligence—CNN has made itself complicit in this annual charade, making it difficult now to accurately assess the relative risk of COVID-19 as compared to flu and, therefore, rationally measure an appropriate response.
2. CNN assertion: CNN routinely promotes the flu shot for everyone older than 6 months, proclaiming that the best way to protect against serious cases of the ailment “is to get a flu shot”.
Fact: In reality, there is absolutely no scientific basis for the CDC’s assertion that the influenza vaccine is the most effective way to prevent the flu.
The Cochrane Collaboration’s comprehensive 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has “no effect” on hospitalization, and that there is “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.”
The Cochrane Researchers concluded in 2010 that the scientific evidence “seem[s] to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
Four years later, Cochrane published a follow-up meta-review including dozens of more recent scientific studies and again concluded bluntly that the body of scientific data provides “no evidence for the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
In other words, despite CNN’s relentless hectoring, there is no scientific evidence that all the billions of dollars America spends on influenza vaccination each year actually provides any health benefit, much less a net economic benefit—apart from the financial windfall to the four pharmaceutical companies that manufacture these vaccines—and who happen to be among CNN’s top advertisers.
3. CNN assertion: You and CNN frequently parrot CDC’s claim that a flu shot reduces the chances that an individual will transmit the flu to others. Pandemic repeated this assertion. CNN offers this supposed benefit as the justification for school vaccine mandates.
Fact: However, in their 2010 systematic meta review of the literature, the Cochrane researchers found “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications”.
Even more worrisome, a study from January 18, 2018, in the Journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, PNAS, found that influenza vaccination actually increased transmission of the virus, with vaccinated individuals shedding more than six times as much aerosolized virus in their breath than unvaccinated individuals.
Those scientists were not altogether surprised by this finding explaining that “certain types of prior immunity”—in this case, the kind of immunity conferred by the vaccine as opposed to naturally acquired immunity— “promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation.” They conclude that, “If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.”
4. CNN assertion: CNN frequently repeats CDC’s advice that children should get the flu shot, which you assure CNN’s audience has been proven safe.
Fact: A 2012 Cochrane review looking at studies of influenza vaccination in healthy children found no safety studies in children under age two, and declared that safety studies were “urgently required”.
5. CNN assertion: CNN also promotes CDC’s recommendation that all pregnant women get a flu shot.
Fact: CDC recommends the flu shot for pregnant women despite the fact that every influenza vaccine package insert contains warnings about the lack of safety studies in pregnant women and nursing mothers.
The CDC’s current recommendation that all pregnant women receive flu shots is a dangerous proposition according to California Institute of Technology Professor Paul Patterson, a neuroscientists whose research has included immune activation during pregnancy. In his research, Dr. Patterson reported that any immune activation during pregnancy, whether from an infection or a vaccine, can cause damage in the developing fetal brain and an increase risk of autism.
In 2008, Scientific American Mind quoted Patterson criticizing the CDC’s policy of administering flu vaccines during pregnancy. “I don’t think they have considered this risk,” he said. “In fact, I know they have not considered this risk.” Patterson elaborated, “If you take it seriously and vaccinate everybody, then what is going to happen? Researchers cannot yet predict how often a prenatal immune response might lead to fetal brain damage, but even if it happens less than 1 percent of the time, vaccinating an entire population of pregnant women could affect thousands of children.”
Research by Goldman in 2013 documented a 11 fold increase in fetal loss reports following the 2009-2010 pandemic flu season when pregnant women received two flu vaccines during pregnancy, the seasonal flu vaccine and the H1N1 vaccine.
In a study published in the British Medical Journal in 2014, Giuseppe Traversa and colleagues assessed maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of women given the influenza A/H1N1 vaccine. The outcomes of more than 86,000 pregnancies revealed that vaccinated women had significantly higher rates of gestational diabetes and eclampsia. Eclampsia is the development of seizures in a woman with severe toxemia, a condition characterized by high blood pressure and protein loss in the urine. Eclampsia is fatal in 2 percent of women and can result in long-term health problems in those who survive. Fetal complications, including neurological damage and death, are also common. Both gestational diabetes and eclampsia are related to inflammation and immune dysregulation, making the connection to the immune stimulation of the flu vaccine very plausible.
A 2014 Cochrane review found that the number of randomized, placebo-controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant women waszero. The independent review states, “The only evidence available comes from observational studies with modest methodological quality. On this basis, vaccination shows very limited effects.”
A 2016 study by Chambers et al. found a moderately elevated risk for birth defects among children born to mothers who received one flu vaccine during the 2010-2014 flu seasons.
A 2017 CDC study links miscarriage to flu vaccines, particularly in the first trimester. Pregnant women vaccinated in the 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 flu seasons had two times greater odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days of receiving the vaccine. In women who had received the H1N1 vaccine in the previous flu season, the odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days were 7.7 times greater than in women who did not receive a flu shot during their pregnancy.
Another study published in 2017 found an elevated risk of autism spectrum disorders in children whose mothers had a first trimester flu shot. Flu vaccine administration is documented to cause an inflammatory response in pregnant women. Recent research found inflammation during pregnancy is associated with the development of autism spectrum disorders.
One of the largest studies to date was conducted in 2004 by CDC scientists from the Vaccine Safety Datalink workgroup in approximately 50,000 pregnant women over five flu seasons. The researchers found no difference in the risk for developing influenza or similar illnesses between those who received the influenza vaccine during pregnancy and those who did not. Hospital admissions for influenza or pneumonia for women in the study population were quite rare and no women died of respiratory illness during pregnancy.
A 2019 article by Alberto Donzelli in Human Vaccination & Immunotherapeutics, asks the question, “Influenza vaccination for all pregnant women?” and argues, “So far the less biased evidence does not favour it”. Donelli found that public health recommendations on flu shots during pregnancy had systematically overestimated “the vaccine effectiveness and safety”—and that the published science showed “an excess of local adverse effects and a tendency for serious adverse events with uncertain or very limited protection against influenza”. Donzelli observes that flu vaccine trials in Africa and Asia have shown excessive infection and deaths in infants associated with flu shots during pregnancy.
Furthermore, about 1/3 of U.S. flu shots still contain bolus doses of thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative. Thimerosal’s material safety data sheet (MSDS) and Thimerosal’s label both advise against its use during pregnancy, pointing out that Thimerosal has never been shown to be safe and that it causes mutations in mammals. Thimerosal is recognized as a reproductive toxicant in the state of California Outlined below is a review by the California Environment Protection Agency regarding the use of thimerosal as it relates to Proposition 65 in California.
In 2001 the National Academies of Science, Institute of Medicine reviewed the safety of thimerosal in vaccines. The committee recommended that “full consideration be given by appropriate professional societies and government agencies to removing thimerosal from vaccines administered to infants, children, or pregnant women in the United States.” The CDC has failed to act on that recommendation despite the fact that they were the ones who convened the IOM’s review of thimerosal.
6. CNN assertion: CNN urges seniors to get their flu shots. CDC credits the vaccine with a dramatic reduction in influenza-related deaths among the elderly.
Fact: The scientific community has thoroughly debunked CDC’s claims that the flu shot reduces death among seniors.
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) ridicule CDC’s mortality claims in a study published in April 2005 in Archives of Internal Medicine (now JAMA Internal Medicine). Those NIH researchers pointed out that, despite a dramatic increase in vaccination coverage among people aged 65 or older—from at most 20 percent before 1980 to 65 percent in 2001—pneumonia and influenza mortality rates “rose substantially during this period”.
The lead author of the 2005 NIH study, Lone Simonsen, was also coauthor with W. Paul Glezen of a 2006 commentary in the International Journal of Epidemiology that reiterated the problems with the CDC’s claims. “Although the vaccination rate for elderly people had increased by as much as 67 percent from 1989 to 1997, there was no evidence that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or deaths. On the contrary, “mortality and hospitalization rates continued to increase rather than decline”.
The 2005 NIH study authors commented that this result was “surprising” since vaccination was supposed to be “highly effective at reducing influenza-related mortality”—an assumption underlying CDC policy that “has never been studied in clinical trials”.
Similarly, a 2008 review in Virology Journal, observes that contrary to the CDC’s claims of a great beneficial effect on mortality, “influenza mortality and hospitalization rates for older Americans significantly increased in the 80s and 90s, during the same time that influenza vaccination rates for elderly Americans dramatically increased.”
In a 2013 BMJ commentary, Dr. Doshi asked, “what evidence is there that influenza vaccines reduce deaths of older people—the reason the policy was originally created? Virtually none…” This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes.”
“Perhaps most perplexing,” Doshi added, “is officials’ lack of interest in the absence of good quality evidence.”
7. CNN assertion: You frequently inform the CNN audience that “the flu vaccine is safe, and significant side effects are very rare.”
Fact: Actual injury rates are impossible to determine since flu shots are exempt from pre-and-post-marketing placebo studies required of other medicines, and because HHS’s post-marketing surveillance system, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System [VAERS], captures “fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries” according to a 2010 HHS-funded study. Nevertheless, some alarming metrics ought to give you pause when you offer these assurances to millions of viewers; Flu vaccines account for nearly ¼ of payouts for injuries by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund (VICA). The Vaccine Court has paid out nearly $1 billion for injuries and deaths caused by flu shots.
GSK’s vaccine, Flulaval lists, on its manufacturing inserts, over 45 chronic diseases and adverse reactions that FDA believes may be linked to the vaccine. These include a long menu of immune system, allergic, musculoskeletal, psychiatric, respiratory, skin, vascular, and neurological diseases including seizure, paralysis, and syncope.
Australian data link the influenza vaccine during the 2009 – 2010 flu season to a 1-in-110 risk in children of having febrile convulsions. The pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in Europe was associated with a 1-in-55,000 risk of developing narcolepsy. CDC acknowledges that the Pandemrix flu vaccine is associated with an “increased risk of narcolepsy”.
A 2015 meta-analysis published in the journal Vaccine has acknowledged “a small but statistically significant association between influenza vaccines, particularly the pandemic ones, and Guillen-Barre Syndrome (GBS)”.
A 2004 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA, noted that GBS was “the most frequent neurological condition reported after influenza vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS)”.
The 2010 Cochrane meta-analysis chided that the post-mortality studies found that a statistically significant association between the influenza vaccine and GBS “demonstrate the danger of commencing a large vaccination campaign without adequate harms assessment.”
8. CNN assertion: On March 5, 2020, you and Anderson Cooper did a “Town Hall” segment, “Corona Facts and Fears”, in which you fervently urged listeners to get the flu shot as the best way to keep healthy during the coronavirus pandemic. According to Anderson, “If you are concerned about coronavirus, you should get a flu shot”.
Fact: However, the only study we have been able to find assessing flu shots and coronavirus is a January 2020 US Pentagon study that found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%. “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as “virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…”
9. CNN assertion: Sanjay, I’ve watched your video assuring the public that getting the flu shot cannot increase one’s chances of getting the flu.
Fact: While that assertion has some meager support from a very small number of studies, the overwhelming weight of published science suggests that getting an annual flu shot can actually increase your risk of both flu and flu-like illnesses.
Only about 7 percent to 15 percent of what are called “influenza-like illnesses” are actually caused by influenza viruses. Many studies suggest the flu vaccine increases vulnerability to both flu infections and the remaining 85% -93% of non-flu respiratory infections.
A 2011 study of healthy Australian children published in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal found that seasonal flu shots increase the risk of flu by 73% and doubled the risk of non-flu respiratory infections.
Similarly, another 2012 randomized controlled trial published in Clinical Infectious Diseases found that influenza-vaccinated children had no significantly lessened risk from influenza and also a higher risk of infection from non-influenza viruses.
Furthermore, the flu vaccine depletes capacity to fight off future flu infections. In April 2010, a study (by Skowronek, et al) published in the journal PLoS Medicine reported the “unexpected” finding from four epidemiologic studies in Canada that receipt of the influenza vaccine for the 2008 – 2009 season, while apparently effective in reducing the risk of illness due to the seasonal flu, was associated with an increased risk of illness due to the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) “swine flu” virus during the spring and summer of 2009. The scientists suggested that this finding could be due to the difference in the way the vaccine affects the immune system compared with natural infection.
Under this hypothesis, repeated vaccination “effectively blocks the more robust, complex, and cross-protective immunity afforded by prior infection.”
When unvaccinated people are infected with the seasonal influenza virus, they often develop a robust cell-mediated immunity that not only protects against that strain of the virus but is also cross-protective against other strains.
People who’ve annually received the influenza vaccine, on the other hand, “may have lost multiple opportunities for infection-induced cross-immunity.” This is because the vaccine is designed to stimulate a strong antibody response, or humoral immunity, but does not confer the same kind of robust cell-mediated immunity as natural infection.
NIH researchers in their 2005 study also acknowledged the superior effectiveness of naturally acquired immunity at reducing mortality, pointing out that senior citizens who contracted the H3N2 influenza pandemic infection demonstrated a robust immunity in subsequent flu seasons when compared to vaccinated individuals. The sharp decline in influenza-related deaths among people aged 65 to 74 years in the years immediately after the 1968 flu pandemicwas most likely due to the acquisition of natural immunity to these viruses (from natural infections).
Another study published in 2011 in the Journal of Virology confirmed that annual influenza vaccination indeed hampers the development of a robust cell-mediated immunity. Annual vaccination for influenza, the authors concluded, “may render young children who have not previously been infected with an influenza virus more susceptible to infection with a pandemic influenza virus of a novel subtype.”
A 2018 CDC study found there was an increase of acute respiratory infections caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens following influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period. The authors recommended that potential mechanisms for this association warrant further investigation.
While most studies have looked at only one or two flu seasons, a CDC-funded study published in September 2014 in Clinical Infectious Diseases considered the long-term effects of repeated annual vaccination by looking at five years of vaccination data.
The CDC researchers found that the more that people had been vaccinated in prior years, the less effective the vaccine is at preventing the most recent season’s dominant H3N2 virus.
As they put it, “vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years.”
Essentially, the immune system remembers the original infection and puts out a rapid defense against it, at the expense of developing a new but more appropriate response specifically to the currently infecting strain.
The CDC scientists warned that their data “raises relevant questions about the potential interference of repeated annual influenza vaccination and possible residual protection from previous season vaccination”; the authors called for further studies.
10. CNN assertion: One final observation about a different vaccine; In CNN’s regular promotion of measles vaccines, CNN and Sanjay frequently claim that natural measles mortalities are 1-2 in 1000. Those estimates seem calculated to frighten people into taking a measles shot and to drive MMR mandates.
Fact: CDC’s 1963 mortality and morbidity data show that prior to the introduction of the measles vaccine, improvements in nutrition and hygeine had already driven US measles mortality in U.S. to 400 per year, a population ratio of 1/500,000 and a death-case ratio of 1 in 10,000—about the same risk of dying from a lightning strike. Most of those mortalities were among malnourished children, many of whom suffered from intellectual disabilities. The best evidence suggests that measles mortalities would have continued to drop with the introduction of food stamps, W.I.C, and other childhood nutritional programs passed during the War on Poverty after 1964 to relieve hunger in impoverished communities.
In their 2010 meta-analysis, the Cochrane researchers accused the CDC of deliberately misrepresenting the science in order to support their universal influenza vaccination recommendation. Nevertheless, CNN continually broadcasts CDC pronouncements as gospel and, ironically, ridicules those of us who actually read the science as “purveyors of ‘vaccine misinformation’”.
Multiple comprehensive federal investigations and whistleblower declarations have documented the corrupt relationship between the CDC’s Vaccine Branch and the four vaccine makers: Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, and GSK. These include a 2000 report by the US Congress Government Oversight Committee, a 2009 report by the Federal HHS Inspector General, a 2014 letter by David Wright, Director of HHS Office of Research Integrity, and a 2011 letter to Carmen S. Villar, chief of staff for Tom Frieden, from an organization of CDC scientists calling itself “SPIDER”.
In 2014, CDC’s senior vaccine safety scientist, Dr. William Thompson, a 17-year CDC veteran who continues to work for CDC, confessed in a series of depositions, and public and private statements, that his CDC bosses in CDC’s Immunization Branch had systematically ordered him and other researchers to destroy data and falsify study outcomes to hide CDC research linking vaccines to the exploding epidemic of childhood chronic diseases including autism. Doesn’t the abundant evidence of corruption at the Federal health agencies amplify CNN’s obligation to treat government pronouncements with skepticism?
At a 2004 workshop for the Institute of Medicine, CDC unveiled a blueprint for the agency’s annual campaigns of fear and deception in a PowerPoint entitled “‘Recipe’ for Fostering Public Interest and High Vaccine Demand”. CDC’s in-house P.R. flack Glen Nowak explained that it was necessary to use fear marketing to sell vaccines. CDC’s campaign called for encouraging television medical experts (like Sanjay and Elizabeth Cohen) to “state concern and alarm” about “and predict dire outcomes” from the flu season. To inspire the necessary terror, the CDC planned to encourage its tame journalists to describe each season as “very severe”, “more severe than last or past years”, and “deadly”. CDC’s press flacks stressed that it was especially important to inspire “concern, anxiety, and worry” among young, healthy adults who don’t regard the flu with sufficient dread.
As the CDC bluntly stated it, “Health literacy is a growing problem”. In other words, the CDC considers it to be a problem that people are increasingly doing their own research and becoming more adept at educating themselves about health-related issues; Why? Because people who do their own research, read the science, and make informed choices rather than blindly following the CDC’s recommendations are less likely to get the flu shot.
“Drug companies”, Dr. Doshi observes, “have long known that to sell some products, you would have to first sell people on the disease.” Only, in the case of the influenza vaccine, Doshi adds, “the salesmen are public health officials”. These public health officials have, in turn, transformed trusted journalists and television doctors into Pharma marketing reps.
CNN likes to portray CDC’s annual flu shot campaigns as an important public health ritual. The peer-reviewed science exposes CDC’s campaigns as a mercantile propaganda project that is costly and may be injuring public health. CNN can fault CDC officials as the source of its “vaccine misinformation”. But this is a weak gesture. “People in power lie”, my father once told me. The function of journalism is to apply scrutiny and skepticism to the pronouncements of government officials and powerful corporations.
Finally, Sanjay, you and Anderson Cooper often comment with dismay on the monumental tragedy, for our democracy, of having a president who habitually lies. But presidents come and go; the more enduring tragedy, arguably, is that we cannot trust our news media to tell us the truth about vital health issues when advertising dollars are at stake. You scratch your head and wonder how all those Trump supporters don’t share your indignation at President Trump’s mendacity. One answer is that they are disheartened by once-trusted media outlets who have also set the precedent of routinely lying and violating the public trust, wounding in the process our democracy, public faith in critical institutions, and the health of our children.
Sincerely,
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
President, Children’s Health Defense
P.S. Just as a reminder, here is a 60 Minutes program from over 30 years ago. This is what journalism looked like before Pharma purchased the media.
RFK Jr sounds like a science denier....... /s
Studies? We don’t need no stinking studies! We’ve heard the proclamation from our Lords from the house of CDC!
I’ll just toss this in since it raised my eyebrows...
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/season/faq-flu-season-2022-2023.htm
“CDC tracks the number of flu vaccines administered at pharmacies and doctor’s offices by utilizing new sources of vaccination data, including IQVIA data for vaccinations administered in retail pharmacies (e.g., pharmacy chains, mass merchandise, food stores, and independent pharmacies) and doctors’ offices. Visit CDC’s Weekly Flu Vaccination Dashboard for more information.”
Okaaaay...
BTW, folks, it’s not just how the vaxx is made. I’d ask about adjuvants, too....
Del Bigtree (in a video) was going off on all the aluminum in shots (as adjuvants) - metal should not be injected into the human body. Not sure if in flu shots, but definitely in shots kids get. If I can find it again, I will post it - I might have seen something on RFK Jr’s site too.
I agree. They can say it is safe and effective and have the press cover for them a period of time, but eventually word is going to circulate that something isn't quite right.
Why on earth did you get a flu shot? You should read the article.
I have always admired you, Sanjay. Your obvious talents aside, you seem to be genuinely compassionate and to value integrity.
..
..you, Sanjay, are today among the most prolific broadcasters of ‘vaccine misinformation.’
/\
Well,, not much integrity that you would notice.
Other than that, Kennedy nailed it.
I took his “praise” of Sanjay as somewhat tongu-in-cheek sarcasm. RFk Jr nailed “it” & Sanjay/CNN IMO.
I can’t find what I thought I saw .... one was on GETTR & if I don’t like/repost it, there’s no way to keep track of it. Anyway, on Del’s Highwire site, when I was looking for recent comments, there was this from December 22, 2019:
STUDY: CDC Vaccine Schedule Likely Induces Aluminum Toxicity in Newborns
https://thehighwire.com/editorial/study-cdc-vaccine-schedule-likely-induces-aluminum-toxicity-in-newborns/
Here’s the description:
When it comes to vaccines, nobody ever wants to talk about the aluminum element, and now we understand even better why that is.
A new study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology concluded the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine schedule was 15.9 times over the recommended safe level of aluminum when researchers adjusted for body weight.
Study researchers also estimated that a child who followed the vaccine schedule would be in a state of “chronic toxicity” for 70% of the child’s first seven months of life, 149 days from birth to seven months.
The new study builds on prior work that established a “safe” baseline of aluminum in vaccines for infants. This baseline is derived from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) limits for adults, corrected for body weight per dose.
Deemed ‘settled science,’ the current rationale for injected aluminum has been based on a broad-brush approach ignoring age, weight, and individual considerations such as genetics and environmental influences on detoxification.
The authors went beyond the limited and unscientific one-size-fits-all that drives the historic and current vaccine paradigm. Both the CDC and FDA are telling the public and the medical community that injected aluminum is not harmful to children. But a growing global body of work and common sense is pointing to a bigger story.
People are demanding answers. They are becoming increasingly aware that the official government channels have shown little intent to say anything different. This new research was supported by private donations from the public.
Aluminum has been found in the brains of patients with Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, and autism. Evidence is also growing that a host of chronic illnesses of unknown causes that are difficult to diagnose, such as PANDAS/PANS and chronic fatigue syndrome, may at least in part be due to vaccine aluminum intolerance.
It’s long been considered a medical taboo and probably career suicide to suggest any deviation from the CDC’s recommended schedule. Still, this study looked at three separate schedules:
The CDC schedule for 2019
A CDC schedule the researchers modified specifically choosing low dose aluminum for DTaP and no aluminum for Hib vaccines
Dr. Paul Thomas’s “Vaccine-Friendly Plan” schedule
For years, pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas (who is one of the study’s authors), has offered an alternative schedule he created, called the “Vaccine-Friendly Plan.” Not unexpectedly, Dr. Thomas received media blowback for daring to deviate from the CDC’s vaccine timing/schedule, despite the gaps in science to justify its use.
One gap to mind is a comparison of total health outcomes between vaccinated children adhering to the CDC’s schedule versus unvaccinated. It doesn’t exist. Earlier this year, Dr. Thomas commissioned an independent quality assurance project running a deep dive into the data from his practice. Identifying thousands of patients born into his practice over nearly eleven years, the analysis revealed some shocking truths about the health of his patients receiving various levels of vaccination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjvjf4MnFqc
The current FDA regulation allows for a wide range of aluminum. Anywhere from 25 μg/L (should we explain what this is?) to 1250 μg/single dose in vaccines. Body-weight is not considered. Nor does this regulation “consider cumulative doses from multiple vaccines received at one time.”
The CDC schedule permits many vaccines per office visit and thus per day, a practice recently supercharged by government-mandated ‘catch-up’ schedules. These schedules have been foisted upon families by a slew of legislation happening across the U.S., making vaccine compliance mandatory.
The study’s lead author, James Lyons-Weiler, says, “We are in the process now of another study determining what impact “catch up” vaccine schedules have on the safe limits of aluminum.”
The so-called “settled science” justifying aluminum adjuvants in vaccines for human use leaves much to be desired. 2004’s Priest study took measurements of retained aluminum covering a 12-year period of a single adult volunteer after a single injection with citrate solution containing aluminum. It also included a small study of six adult male subjects over a shorter period of time.
Yes, you read that right.
These studies have clear flaws. Citrate solutions are not used in vaccination, for one thing. Another is that the studies involved adults, not infants or children.
FDA scientist Robert Mitkus used a variety of equations from the Priest study and applied them to ingested aluminum in 2011. Mitkus’s study is used as the current rationale to justify injected aluminum’s safety for all ages, weights, genders, and individual genetic variations. Again, you read that right: an ingested aluminum study is used to justify injected aluminum.
https://www.facebook.com/ICANdecide/videos/1052943788178958/
To date, scientific literature has provided scant evidence to justify injected aluminum’s safety. To further complicate matters, it has been speculated that for at least some individuals, the body’s ability to clear aluminum might be slowed by previous exposure to the element. In addition, individuals have varying abilities to detoxify heavy metals and toxins in general, such as those with renal dysfunction, infants, and even more so, infants in neonatal units.
In the paper’s discussion, the authors state:
“Under our modeled conditions, the highest expected %alumTox would occur in low birth or body-weight infants with a genetic or environmental detoxification deficiency, such as those born to low-income mothers or who are malnourished.”
Lyons-Weiler provided a statement to The HighWire:
“We’re calling for the FDA to do the right kind of study concerning injected aluminum. Regulatory bodies and advisory boards should not be adding more vaccines to the recommended schedule until the current schedule’s aluminum burden can be proven safe.”
We’ll see what impact the paper’s findings and suggestions yield from notoriously stubborn and slow-to-change regulatory agencies. For now, the publicly funded findings remain open and transparent for parents and pediatricians to consider and researchers to build upon.
I really like Del Bigtree and his passion for uncovering the truth amidst all the CDC, FDA, Fauci, et all lies. Del is the founder of ICAN (the Informed Consent Action Network). In looking for the info on aluminum, I ran into all sorts of ‘hit’ pieces on Del .... the Left & those promoting the “official narrative” really hate him. One reason they hate him so bad:
“The CDC created v-safe, a smartphone-based program, to collect health assessments after Covid-19 vaccination. Approximately 10 million people signed-up and submitted health reports after Covid-19 vaccination.
ICAN’s legal team sued the CDC twice leading to a court order requiring release of the data. ICAN has taken the CDC’s official raw data and created a dashboard interface which allows users to graphically view the 144+ million health entries obtained by ICAN.”
https://icandecide.org/article/v-safe/
Note from me: the data did not lend credence to the claims by Pharma/FDA/CDC that the shots are ‘safe & effective’, thus the reason CDC was so intent on withholding the data from the public.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ICAN Mission:
At the Informed Consent Action Network, you are the authority over your health choices and those of your children. In a medical world manipulated by advertising and financial interests, true information is hard to find and often harder to understand. Our goal is to put the power of scientifically researched health information in your hands and to be bold and transparent in doing so, thereby enabling your medical decisions to come from tangible understanding, not medical coercion.
Founder Message:
Our founding fathers fought against tyranny to realize the dream of a great and free nation. It is time for the free people of the greatest nation on earth to stand up for our freedom to choose what’s healthy for our own bodies, before the industrial agriculture and pharmaceutical industries pass laws that force those decisions upon us.
Who We Are
Investigating the safety of medical procedures, pharmaceutical drugs, and vaccines while educating the public of their right to “informed consent.”
FIGHTING FOR PARENTS’ RIGHTS
PROTECTING CHILDREN
SCIENCE-BASED INQUIRY
REASONABLE REQUESTS
CHILDREN FIRST
DOCTOR-FRIENDLY
~ Del Bigtree (Founder)
tongue-in-cheek ..... not tongu LOL!
The flu went through our house this Thanksgiving. My grand nephew came over. He was feeling run down but thought it was from heavy cardio exercises for wrestling. Next day he was in ER. Diagnosed with upper Respiratory infection. His grand mom got sick on Saturday and she spent Sunday in ER. They did give her tests for covid / flu. Came out as flu. She did get the flu shot but only a week ago. I got the flu shot the beginning of Nov and so far not having any symptoms. It is a nasty version this year. Vise like headaches and coughing so much the stomach hurts. You get it suggest you go in for treatment available ( steroids, breathing treatment,etc.)
Glad everyone came through ok!
FLCCC has come up with a protocol for influenza/RSV in adults because this year, flu is “back” after supposedly disappearing during the worst of COVID .... RSV, too.
Diagnosing and Managing Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infections in Adults
https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/flu-rsv-treatment/
machman :" Studies? We don’t need no stinking studies!
We’ve heard the proclamation from our Lords from the house of CDC!"
The CDC has pretty much shot up it's own credibility when they invented information out of their a$$ about wearing masks, and then lied about it.
Furthermore, they totally ignored previous medical protocol by not having long-term clinical trials,
and the CDC stated that it would take 74 years to release any data about the vaccine and its ingredients.
Pfizer and the Federal government lost their credibility when the Pfizer CEO admitted to the EU that they had NEVER tested the covid injection against the covid virus
prior to release to the general public, and later to the Federal mandate that all Federal employees and military to take the biologic injection (via coercion).
The injection is two experiments in one shot: the totally untested Pfizer "vaccine", which required the CDC to rewrite the definition of "vaccine",
and secondly, the mRNA delivery system.
The long-term effects of these two "experiments" remain unknown at this time.
Is there any truth to story I have seen that Pfizer and Moderna have the carbon based substance called Graphene (sp?), perhaps as an adjuvant?
Regarding aluminum traces in the body, that potential from using aluminum cookware was in the health community news 40 years ago, particulary when cooking acid foods. I have been avoiding aluminum cookware since then. In addition I have also read that some deodorants have aluminum too. So I try to read labels before buying them.
When parents talk with me about baby and child vaccines, I urge them to never allow more than 3 to be given at one time, and also only if the child is in good health at the time of the doctor visit. I am not a total vaccine denier, but have avoided the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. I took J&J and the boster in 2021 because I would not be allowed to attend my partner’s Thanksgiving dinner. His son is a conventionally educated doctor working in a major medical facility.
This year he was not asking about our boosters which I have not taken and probably will not since J&J is hard to find, and in addition to my usual supplements I take extra Quercetin and Zinc any time I have been exposed to other people in an indoor setting for a while. I also take them the day before and for a week afterwards when I have a vaccine, like my flu shot this year. I also did that last year when I had my 2 J&Js. I had absolutely no symptems from any of these 3 shots with the Q and Z usage. His doctor son also insisted that we have the DTaP before we visited his infant son.
I have been taking a gradually growing list of supplements for 50+ years and fixed a lot of beginning symptoms of aging. In the past 10 years I have taken the long term vaccines for pheumonia, shingles, tetanus, DTaP, and most years the annual flu vaccine. I have had mild symptoms of sore shoulder and feeling slightly sick sometimes. However, with my new routine of using extra Quercetin and Zinc, have had no symptoms whatsoever. Also while doing research for my brother’s and partner’s cancers, I discovered a research paper which has found that NO, I repeat NO cancer cells have been found with adequate amounts of Zinc, even though healthy cells nearby have had healthy Zinc levels. They are looking at the possibility of treating cancer with Zinc and an ionophore.
He cites several...
OTH, they are not very eager to do studies either.
Thanks, bitt. Appreciate the ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.