He is a prude. This stuff is silly, maybe, but fun. It’s like the History Channel Aliens guy and the Von Daniken “Chariots of the God’s” stuff.
Why not?
I think it gives weak minded people the illusion of knowledge.
20 years ago on a trip to Athens, I went on a day guided tour and there was a retired gent from, I think Vermont who was asking the guide continuously about Dan Brown’s book. I pointed out to him the flaws in it but he went on believing those stoas facts.
Anyone that has read Hancock knows that he does not believe aliens were involved in building Earth’s impossibly complex ancient structures - and he cites the Giza pyramid as only one example. The blocks at Balbek and the complex at Golbeki Tepi are, to him, far more interesting
Not at all. There are a lot of megalithic structures that could not be built today, so how do you explain that?
Civilization was either more advanced than we give it credit for or aliens came and helped.
Which do you think is more likely?
I watched the first episode. They used geophysical methods to locate “voids” below the old pyramid structure in Indonesia.
They drilled the site. They never drilled into any voids, yet kept talking about the “burial chambers”, etc. I haven’t watched anymore of it.