Portland Antifa can claim total victory against Andy Ngo

American Thinker ^ | 16 Nov, 2022 | Andrea Widburg

[MtnClimber]

Not only did the judge give a pass to an Antifa activist, but he also scolded Ngo for reporting on Antifa activities.

Superman had to deal with Bizarro World, a place in which everything is backward and evil is ascendant, and Andy Ngo has to contend with Portland, which pretty much seems to be the same. The latest travesty is that, after the judge heard Andy Ngo’s case against an Antifa activist whom Ngo filmed throwing a liquid at him and grabbing his phone, the judge not only gave the activist a pass, but the judge also scolded Ngo for daring to report Antifa activities.

Most people who followed Antifa’s activities in Portland, whether leftists or conservatives, are familiar with Andy Ngo. At great risk to himself, he reported what the Antifa gang was doing, whether silencing conservative speech, going to war against the city, state, and federal government in Portland, or physically attacking conservatives, including Ngo himself. In every case, Ngo has always had the video to prove that these attacks were real.

In May 2019, Ngo filmed John Hacker, an Antifa member, who throw a liquid at Ngo, threatened Ngo’s property, and then seized that property, returning it only when gym members implored him to do so:

The encounter at the gym was recorded by Ngo on his cell phone more than three years ago, and was finally played in court. The shaky video is less than 30 seconds long, but prosecutors say it’s a key piece of evidence showing Hacker approaching Ngo, grabbing the device, and yelling, ”I will break your f*cking phone.”

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[kiryandil]

Throw a liquid at that “judge” [stooge], and see what happens.

[MtnClimber]

Thanks for that post. I may need to read it a few times to make sure I comprehend.

[BiteYourSelf]

SSS?🤔

[Antoninus]

At some point, when justice is denied so blatantly, citizens begin taking the law into their own hands. I’m not saying they should—it’s just a historical fact that they will.

[Antoninus]

At some point, when justice is denied so blatantly, citizens begin taking the law into their own hands. I’m not saying they should—it’s just a historical fact that they will.

[Amendment10]

Thanks for reply.

Another way of looking at previous post is this, As a consequence of many of the authors of the articles referenced by FReepers probably not being up to speed with the Constitution’s division of federal and state powers, authors inadvertently leave out information needed to decide if federal or state government actors have overstepped their constitutional authority on an issue.

In this example, I dimly remember the Ngo case, and I don’t know from article if it was a federal or state judge that decided against Ngo. Knowing federal or state judge would help to decide possible federal or state government overreach concerting due process for Ngo imo.

Also, consider additional option of critiquing anything I put in a post. You might change my mind.