Posted on 11/14/2022 10:28:41 PM PST by hardspunned
Mitch McConnell got some of that tax payer FXT Ukraine money. Now you know why the uni-party @GOP @DNC didn’t want a audit of Ukraine money & had to get rid of Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Oh, I misspoke! Money laundering is not ALWAYS a one-for-one exchange. In many cases, a 50% loss of value is acceptable to the launderer as a ‘cost of doing business’.
So the exact opposite of what you say is true. Money-launderers do not pull out extra money, they often pull out LESS.
However, I would not call this a money-laundering operation. It is apparent it is a Racketeering operation in violation of American RICO laws.
Oh Sure I know their is a “cost of doing business”..
IF FTX was doing money laundering for Dems or Repubs(McConnell), then prosecute! No arguments from me! My only bone of contention was the accusation that taxpayer money/Ukraine was involved. I just dont it yet.
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/faq/moneylaundering/
“In some instances, the launderer might disguise the transfers as payments for goods or services, thus giving them a legitimate appearance.”
Like I said, money laundering example.
I think FreshPrince’s sole purpose here is the defense of Ukraine and our support for Ukraine in their fight against Russia. And he’s not the only one.
Well, then he's out of luck because I support neither.
But looking at his posting history, he's a Lefty for other reasons.
“Well, then he’s out of luck because I support neither.”
Well I wasnt hoping for anything from you so...
I am a big believer in the First amendment...so if that makes me a lefty....
"Well, then he's out of luck because I support neither."
The First Amendment has nothing to do with this site.
Exactly!
As Bikkuri stated, the First Amendment doesn't apply on FR as this is a private site, donor funded. Jim Robinson sets the rules.
Well, I will give you a tiny bit of credit. You seem to be racheting down in your defense of FTX and the relationship between them and dirty Democrats (and select dirty Republicans). You seem to be focused now, more, on only a portion of the claim — that US tax money was involved.
However, that speaks to the fungible nature of money. Still... I’ll take your adjusted position and call it progress.
You may be school-able.
“The First Amendment has nothing to do with this site”
I wasnt referring to this site.
“that US tax money was involved.”
Thats all I was focusing on. Read my posts. I was asking again and again how does this involve Ukraine laundering us taxpayer money with no respons. As for all the other stuff, would be no surprise if there was illegalities.
Where have I ever supported lefty policies in govt,school, and culture?
Name one.
Please.
Reread your own posting history.
once again, cant provide anything.
Why bother when you admittedly ignore it? I don't expend effort on someone who dismisses it because they don't like it. This will be a wasted effort.
So you want yo live in a theocracy? Go to iran. They hang gays. Youll love it there.
Yep. There’s a tight-knit little pack of ‘em. If you call one out for overwhelming and polluting the forum with a multitude of propaganda articles from British tabloids, CNN, Newsweek and hole-in-the wall sources, they set their little yip-yapping ankle-nippers on you. I’ve pretty much figured out who the leaders are and who their flying monkeys are.
They come at you with all manner of insults, attacks on your character, outright lies and even threats.
I just laugh at them and give it back to ‘em. It’s all they really understand.
Just remember, every time you piss off a little ankle-nipper, an angel gets his wings. 😁
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.