#ConspiraciesAreUs
Posted on 11/02/2022 1:38:27 PM PDT by ransomnote
#ConspiraciesAreUs
Yep.
I posted some throwback threads, a few posts up.
LOL, so true for Ransomnote
1. These are not peer reviewed journals — they are open sourced journals and fail “peer review”. The “peer review” per the website. The journal does not appear to be a journal as there is no in print circulation. We might as well call Q threads peer reviewed journals as it has the same stringent standards (confirmation bias, and it is “published” on the internet)
2. The linkage between PCR testing and vaccine efficacy is junk science. The actual science behind this is jibberish. But the headline confirms many people’s bias. This is hardly a smoking gun
3. I notice that in typical scientific method, no one has published the actual peer reviewed journal Ivermectin study that everyone who was against vaccination was breathlessly trumpeting earlier this year. A RCT (double blind) showed no statistical significance in time to recovery or death in patients randomized for early treatment to Ivermectin or placebo. It checked all the boxes, early treatment, CoVID (+), RCT. I was wondering if someone would post it — but of course not
3. As a poster down thread states — this blog posting does not state what journal it is in, and generally when one has to hunt for the source publication it is ot all that credible
Thank you for pinging me and letting me know about this article. It is an excellenct example of false authority and confirmational bias.
Have a happy Wednesday!
“We” is the author of this substack piece and a colleague.
-
Sub stack does not publish peer reviewed articles.
In the movie, The Real Anthony Fauci, I thought the guy who invented the PCR test said it should never even have been used for that purpose. A total waste of time.
These were never used in such a context. The vaccine was always “great to have/mandate.”
I assume you think anti-COVID vaccine people wielded undue authority over the Fauci’s of the world, and that governors like DeSantis smeared the vaccine and a mandate for it, using PCR false positives?
Get real.
*************
The vaccine should have been entirely voluntary; but that does not validate the ridiculous claims — especially prevalent on Gateway Pundit — that everyone who dies unexpectedly of heart trouble was killed by the vaccine.
I agree they aren’t responsible for all of those.
….. This work is some of the finest of Dr. Lee's career. In this study, Dr. Lee not only reports that he has verified false positives due to the misapplication of RT-PCR testing:
“PCR was invented to replicate, or to amplify, a target segment of DNA for DNA sequencing without going through a laborious bacterial cloning. PCR needs a pair of primers, single-stranded DNAs of about 20 bases long, to define the segment of target DNA to be replicated. But PCR primer/template hybridization is not fully sequence-specific because PCR primers may attach to nontarget DNAs and amplify unwanted DNAs if these DNAs are present and partially match the primers in nucleotide sequence. As a result, relying on PCR, especially the qPCR technology using Ct numbers as the surrogate for actual PCR product analysis, for disease diagnosis is bound to generate false positives. The experimental results of this work emphasize that while RT-qPCR is generating a significant number of false-positive test results at the current stage of the COVID-19 pandemic…”
He also provides this harrowing conclusion:
“The COVID-19 pandemic could have been avoided or curtailed by using the SARSCoV-1 specific RT-PCR primers in early 2020.” ….
https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/peer-reviewed-study-confirms-fatal
I’ll save time, for any lazies, and, post that link, here….
1. For every 50 true positives out of 1,000, a total of 86 people with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments will be reported.
Of these, 36 of these will be false positives.
2. For every 50 true positives, 86 people without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments will be have to be isolated/quarantined.
Of these, 36 will not be infected.
3. For every 50 true positives that are tested and found positive in-hospital, 86 people with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection or residual fragments
will be told that they "have COVID-19".
If the 36 false positive patients are hospitalized with other COVID-19 patients, they will likely then contract a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4. The number of "cases" via positive PCR has been overstated by a factor of 72% (the original post read “80:1” assuming a prevalence of 5%).
5. This is true for generic case reporting up until May 2021 when CDC decided to reduce the PCR cycle threshold value (Ct) for the vaccinated to less than 27,
leaving the unvaccinated rate biased by high false discovery rate of arbitrarily high Ct, biasing all reported rates in these two groups favoring cases in the unvaccinated from that point on.
6. This +72% bias is true in any clinical trial or any study that used arbitrarily high Ct values, INCLUDING THE VACCINE STUDIES.
As a direct result of this fatal flaw, combined with CDC’s gaff “PCR+ = COVID-19"?
There are no credible COVID-19 vaccine trial data. "
(My Comment) : All bold and Italics shown above are mine
The PCR tests are statistically unreliable and misidentified infection at a significantly high rate
Please read the entire report for your own edification.
The CDC denounced the PCR test in December of 2021 a few days before Christmas.
I found it. It's Science, Public Health Policy & the Law.
The author of this piece is the Editor in Chief and a prolific contributor, and most of the "studies" are anti-vax rants.
The MMR autism link is real, measles isn't really so bad and we should ditch the vaccine for it, big pharma is manipulating the military to mandate vaccines, VAERS sucks, that kind of thing.
Also a few shout-outs to RFK Jr.
All in all about what you would expect.
The fact that there is no uniform testing level for the PCR test re CV 19 means it was unscientific at best. Add in that the test cycles varied between States meant it was designed to choose where and when Cases Cases Cases would peak and fall.
The clot shots killed more people than the Covid, that much is clear though people will deny this.
How were they used to discredit the mRNA treatments. They were NOT vaccines, and what discredits the vaxx is it is more dangerous than getting the stupid virus. Although the PTB in the medical field will deny this, or lose their jobs I might add.
In WA state they didn’t know what cycle they were using on the tests. It was likely 37, that gets you in the 90% of false positives. Some say the tests were PCR 43. They kept no records though, strange for scientists to destroy records.
The false positives kept the fear going and were used to discredit the vaccine.
Johns Hopkins disagrees with you.
And an indirect response to your response gas_dr.
“strange for scientists to destroy records.”
Not if they’re politicos.
Live in the DC area and have seen this stuff over and over.
Corruption is winning. We are going Venezuela. We are going Cuba
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.