Never heard of this so called artist. But he and the writer are both engaged in artistic ******bastion. "Challenged old tropes"...where has this writer been. These "old tropes" have been beaten to a pulp for perhaps 150 years. Us "philistines" will be still admiring a Winterhalter or Ingres long after this "artist" and this writer have been long dead and buried.
1 posted on
10/26/2022 3:14:17 PM PDT by
C19fan
To: C19fan
“I’ve been thinking a lot about portraiture…”
Liberals are insane.
2 posted on
10/26/2022 3:17:24 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: C19fan
How John Mitchell Shakes Up Portraiture Mitchell What is Portraiture Mitchell?
I'll bet punctuation is a key to this mystery.
4 posted on
10/26/2022 3:22:33 PM PDT by
humblegunner
(Ain't drownin', Just wavin'...)
To: C19fan
John Mitchell shakes up portraiture? I bet Martha is behind this
5 posted on
10/26/2022 3:31:27 PM PDT by
llevrok
(Pronouns: Me/myself/& I)
To: C19fan
It sort of rings true to me, as an artist. While I haven’t painted for decades, I do enjoy thinking about how to render various surfaces and I will often spend time looking analytically at all sorts of people/things and the works of various artists.
Mitchell is a modern classicist, from the work shown. My major critique is that he renders fabric better than he renders flesh. His flesh isn’t convincing or even handled differently than the fabric, IMO. Also, I expect some poignancy in portraits. His are enigmatic, contained seperately within the canvas.
He’s no Reuben.
6 posted on
10/26/2022 3:33:10 PM PDT by
reformedliberal
(Make yourself less available.)
To: C19fan
I wouldn’t buy them or hang them in my house, but I like them all. They were all interesting and evoked “something” in me but I’m not sure what at this point.;-)
7 posted on
10/26/2022 3:38:42 PM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(Our government is like a bunch of fleas discussing how they are going to manage their dog.)
To: C19fan
What they hate is the fact that white Europeans and their descendants are responsible for most of the cultural advancement in the world, while most of the historic cultures of what they call “People of Difference” (That’s a new one, POD people?) never advanced beyond tribalism and superstition. If they were objective, they might look at that history and conclude that primitive cultures need to abandon their ways and adopt what has worked so well for Western Civilization, but instead they hold up primitive beliefs and practices as some equivalent (or even superior) to actual civilization.
And when some individual “POD” wisely casts off the primitive nonsense and decides to adopt what works, namely Judeo-Christian values and western social and governmental principles, they are excoriated for “acting white.” Well, the indisputable fact is that what they derisively call “acting white” is what is necessary for all people, regardless of skin color or cultural background, to succeed. It has nothing to do with “whiteness” and everything to do with morality, diligence, and common sense.
8 posted on
10/26/2022 3:40:54 PM PDT by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: C19fan
What’s the point of portraiture when our society isn’t really churning out great men and women to memorialize anymore? Who needs a monument to the mediocre?
9 posted on
10/26/2022 3:51:07 PM PDT by
Boogieman
To: C19fan
“people of difference“
😂🤣😅😂
10 posted on
10/26/2022 3:51:42 PM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: C19fan
11 posted on
10/26/2022 6:32:30 PM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
To: C19fan
Thought this was about the singer Joni Mitchell that just lost two members of her family.
12 posted on
10/26/2022 9:00:34 PM PDT by
drSteve78
(Je suis Deplorable STILL)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson