Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Do Vaccines Consistently Fail to Prevent Disease Transmission?
Substack ^ | 10/26/2022 | A Midwestern Doctor

Posted on 10/26/2022 10:04:32 AM PDT by GailA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Sacajaweau

we’ve been warned not to use so many antibiotics for years now


Yes....using TOO many antibiotics is NOT a good idea.

Too bad the horrid $hots didn’t come with such warnings....regarding one’s immune system, organs, etc. especially after REPEATED doses.

:-(


21 posted on 10/26/2022 11:35:05 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

This is conflation. The mRNA jab is not a vaccine since the CDC changed the definition last year to exclude transmission prevention.

Vaccines do suppress transmission. See every bloody vaccine for last 100 years. I’ve got close to a dozen of them — but not the fake vax.

Fake Vaxes like mRNA do not — unless you pull the usual commie trash trick of redefining words after the fact.


22 posted on 10/26/2022 11:35:21 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
“cuz it's not a vaccine...it's more like an antibiotic...temporary. stops nothing.”

You're close.
The Jab is a non-sterilizing vs a sterilizing injection.

It was engineered to work against a Corona virus which rapidly mutated to avoid any protection. The virus moved faster evolutionary wise than any “booster” could be developed and deployed. The Pharma industry was always 1-2 steps behind.

That's one of the reasons there never has been an effective Corona “vaccine” plus safety corners were cut. The side effects are a totally different issue and were either ignored or hidden.

23 posted on 10/26/2022 11:53:28 AM PDT by Polynikes (Nicht geimpft Mensch 2nd Klasse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck

Because they aren’t 100% effective and never have been?
**********
Vaccines don’t work for everybody. Such as people with compromised immune systems. A vaccine can sometimes be under-strength, as with the Phizer COVID shot. Or there can be bad batches. Thus, if a vaccinated person gets the disease anyway for these reasons, the disease can be transmitted.

But where the vaccine actually prevents a person from getting a disease, he can’t transmit a disease that he doesn’t have. Someone who doesn’t get polio, smallpox, measles, etc., because of vaccination cannot transmit these diseases.


24 posted on 10/26/2022 12:15:36 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GailA

There has never been a successful vaccine against a coronavirus.

This type of virus is a prolific replicator. It’s strength is in the amount of copies it can produce. The quality of those copies is where the problem lies. The number of mutation occurring is massive. At that point, it’s a game of numbers. Some mutations will be effective. Others will die.

The immune system is always playing catch up.


25 posted on 10/26/2022 12:53:38 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

All for a death rate of 2 tenths of 1 percent.
If you are healthy and under 50, survival rate is 99.999%


26 posted on 10/26/2022 1:04:38 PM PDT by GrannyAnn ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GailA

Gee, the Polio and Smallpox vaccines prevented the spread of those diseases didn’t they?


27 posted on 10/26/2022 1:28:11 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Why Do Vaccines Consistently Fail to Prevent Disease Transmission?

A. "Vaccines" -- in general -- DO aid in REDUCING transmission by protecting the vaccinated host so the disease cannot become established in their body; it can get ON them, but not INTO them. So, the vaccinated can carry -- and spread -- the disease EXTERNALLY for only a brief period, as contrasted with them HOSTING the disease INTERNALLY, and being a source of transmission for a longer period.

B. The COVID shots ARE NOT "vaccines" in the traditional sense; the definition of "vaccine" had to be changed in August of 2021 in order to -- illegitimately -- bring them into the fold. The mRNA jabs do not work the way actual vaccines do, they do not confer immunity at all well -- certainly not LASTING immunity, and while they may reduce the severity of an infection, they do not prevent the COVID virus getting INTO the host and being carried about INTERNALLY, so the host becomes a source of transmission for a longer period of time. WORSE, because the COVID shots do mute symptoms, the host may well be unaware they are becoming ill, and remain out and about during the most critical phase of communicability, thus not only not REDUCING transmission, but EXACERBATING it.

I must make one other relevant assertion: POINT B does not describe what's been called "asymptomatic spread" because the vaccinated host does end up with symptoms, feels ill, and takes then-appropriate measures. "Asymptomatic spread" is confined to cases where the individual NEVER feels ill at all, nor manifests any symptoms, but has had a close enough encounter to COVID to have been well and truly exposed, and therefore (in theory, at least) is able to be a surreptitious source of transmission of the COVID virus.

Also, the notion of asymptomatic spread has been quite roundly debunked.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/proof-of-asymptomatic-spread

28 posted on 10/26/2022 2:13:49 PM PDT by HKMk23 (https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

Every flu shot in my 74 years caused me to have the flu. The Bird flu was the worse.


29 posted on 10/27/2022 9:42:21 AM PDT by GailA (Constitution vs evil Treasonous political Apparatchiks, Constitutional Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GailA

Every flu shot in my 74 years caused me to have the flu.

*********

Was that just one or two or are you a slow learner?


30 posted on 10/27/2022 9:44:54 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson