Replies

We can all agree on one thing: That it is in the public interest to as soon as possible confirm or deny the involvement of CoupFlu shots in these deaths.

Yet it’s taking many months to get answers.

And sometimes the question isn’t even asked.

There is no good reason for this when the issue is of absolute importance to public health.

But there’s a very bad reason that explains what were seeing, and not seeing, isn’t there, DB.

And it’s the only one, as more and more evidence piles up, that makes sense.

Here is a data-driven response:

A study Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes-Analysis of 1866 Deaths in the United States, 1980–2006 shows an average of sixty-six (66) deaths per year.

A separate global study, Sudden cardiac death in athletes: the Lausanne Recommendations lists 1101 (1966-2004) reported cases in athletes under 35 years, or an average of 29 per year.

This data set of citizen reports shows 718 (and counting) of such deaths in 2022.

Your entire post is great.

Thanks, DB, for extrapolating all of this info.

What percent increase is that?

FR has been a beacon of information dissemination and demolition derby-like debate around (among other things) the pandemic and the shots. I've had my own views challenged, refined, pressure-tested, blasted, laughed at, and sometimes some people agreed with them. I've read more studies from the NEJM, Lancet, and other "professional" outlets since February 2020 than all the years previous. I've seen pivotal posts that course-corrected views on this bug, the definitional changes of what makes a "case," and this thread on youth fatalities.

As far as I can tell, none of us are "professional" immunologists, medical researchers, etc. We are a ragtag group of citizens. And yet, we are able to crank out thought-provoking articles and threads and posts. Do I agree with all of them? No. Do I think there are some wild ideas? Uh huh. Would I petition the govt to suppress them? NFW.

And yet, the Authorities - with funding, data-access, doctorates, the MSM, and the Bidet Administration - can't produce ONE flipping peer-reviewed study that even TRIES to prove that there isn't a statistically significant increase in sudden youth fatalities. Nothing...nada..zip...zilch. And yet, if any one of the unwashed masses does some long division to produce a stunning data point, they get banned on social media, and possibly swatted. Frankly, I'm surprised FR hasn't been nuked.

Thus, I totally agree with mewzilla (who, btw, wins some sort of prize for lightning fast information and article recall) when she says "There is no good reason for this when the issue is of absolute importance to public health. But there’s a very bad reason that explains what were seeing, and not seeing, isn’t there, DB."

For me, Grampa Dave provided the reason. None of this is about our health.