Replies

“ One can be a Chosen One without being Jesus, God, or a god. I am the proof of that pudding.” ———————————————————————————————————————————- You are correct, Trump isn’t proclaiming, just Re-Thruthing, perhaps in poor judgement, or an aid did it. Go look at the guy’s TS page where the Re-Truth came from. However there are a few that appear to either want to drag the Q movement into a new direction, perhaps propagandist working for who knows. Or those few truly feel compelled. Either way, it needs to be rejected. Its blasphemy, period.

I used to think you had at least a smidgen of intelligence, Chase. Turns out you don't. But its good to see you've developed a new tactic, just as I suggested. Maybe this one will stick?

Oh, and this....

_______________________________

The ‘Q’ Source was contrived around the year 1900. Scholars, a loose term, speculate that the Gospels of Matthew and Luke were derived from old oral traditions of the early Church.

Of the Synoptic Gospels it was concluded (speculated) that because of the uniqueness of the Mark Gospel that it was likely the original material from which the other 2 followed.

It seems from here that you are just a bit too clever in your digging this stuff up in order to equate your absurd postulating that Trump somehow has a ‘Jesus Complex’ for lack of a better term.

You might as well as gone to Ian Fleming's works and pulled up that Q made famous in the movies. Perhaps you could resort to pulling up some Sacred Geometry lore and presenting the Prime Number status of Q or the 17th number. I just love Fibonacci ideas and the Golden Ratio.

Whatever you seek to assert, the notion that the Q movement these days was somehow related to Gospel source materials, completely unprovable by almost all accounts, is laughable yet at once clearly intended to be insulting in multiple fashion.