Q isn’t a theory, right?
Like “Q” or not, Q is a person or people that profess to have inside information and post cryptic phrases, asking people to research for themselves, no?
Anons are anonymous people that have interpreted Q post and researched their clues. (And lots of people that post garbage to attract attention or discredit Q or anons in general, right?)
Do you have a different understanding?
“Q isn’t a theory, right?”
No but there are thousands of “QAnon theories” out there.
As you say, whoever “Q” is they post “cryptic phrases” that are open to interpretation. The “theories” I’m talking about would be those interpretations.
Of course, this only applies to the current iteration of “Q”. The “original” iteration of Q, on 4chan, posted in a much different format, with very clear predictions that were not cryptic at all or open to multiple interpretations. That changed after the deadline that Q set came and went without any of his predictions coming true. The new format only came later when someone using the name “Q” started posting using a different account on a different website.