Minnesota's coward-in-chief.
2 posted on
09/26/2022 11:20:09 AM PDT by
deport
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
The 55 mile by 70 mile rectangle that rigs all Minnesota statewide “elections” will bring home the Swedish meatballs for Walz...
3 posted on
09/26/2022 11:21:11 AM PDT by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
I believe what they saying is Walz was conditionally promoted to the rank of Command Sergeant Major of the First Battalion-125th Field Artillery. That's a whole regiment.
They don't say exactly what the condition is but they seem to imply it's the deployment he didn't go on.
If all that's true Walz should have let his chain of command know to rescind the Command part of Command Sergeant Major when he knew he wasn't going to go. Sergeant Major is a pretty big rank, nothing to be ashamed of at all. Claiming CSM when you didn't fulfill the conditions of promotion sounds pretty serious.
6 posted on
09/26/2022 11:34:38 AM PDT by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
That explains everything I just checked he is a Demorat. Boot him out he’s a poser.
7 posted on
09/26/2022 11:36:05 AM PDT by
Rappini
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
This is dumb. After 35 years of service you get out at the next promotion. Its done all the time. In the army, in education, in the post office. Its very common. There is no reason whatsoever that a guy who does 35 years can’t leave whenever and for whatever reason.
8 posted on
09/26/2022 11:44:38 AM PDT by
poinq
To: ButThreeLeftsDo; Rappini; \/\/ayne; kiryandil
This very last line in the report is revealing:
"...A spokesperson for Walz previously said this topic has been covered before and referred Alpha News to a past story where Walz said 'normally this type of partisan political attack only comes from one who’s never worn a uniform'..."
That's a dead giveaway right there.
There are indeed things more egregious than an attack on military service from one who has never worn a uniform:
1.) Being someone who served, and being a modern day Democrat.
2.) Being a modern day Democrat, and trading on your military background.
As far as I am concerned, both of those things are not only far more egregious than an attack on military service from one who has never worn a uniform.
It is why I have a feeling of utter revulsion when I hear the name "Tulsi Gabbard".
12 posted on
09/26/2022 12:01:41 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(Nolnah's Razor: Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Is Alpha News on the same media playbook that does not allow mentioning a democrat’s political affiliation.
16 posted on
09/26/2022 12:19:40 PM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
REMF bastard. Walz just wants to tell the troops he’s behind them....as far as is humanly possible.
CC
19 posted on
09/26/2022 12:27:41 PM PDT by
Celtic Conservative
(My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
He’s a Demonrat.
This will burnish his qualifications.
21 posted on
09/26/2022 1:34:46 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Welcome to the Matrix . Orwell's "1984" was a warning, not an instruction manual.)
To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Why isn't CBS and Dan Rather all over this story?
22 posted on
09/26/2022 4:34:16 PM PDT by
T Ruth
(Mohammedanism shall be destroyed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson