Third command sergeant major corroborates story of Walz dodging deployment (MN)

AlphaNews ^ | 9/26/22 | Liz Collin

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Minnesota's coward-in-chief.

[deport]

ON THE BACKSTRETCH

[kiryandil]

The 55 mile by 70 mile rectangle that rigs all Minnesota statewide “elections” will bring home the Swedish meatballs for Walz...

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

I’m trying to remain optimistic.

[kiryandil]

I’m trying to remain optimistic.

There MIGHT be a rebellion up there.

Remains to be seen if the Squareheads begin to resent their doormatness for the DNC.

[\/\/ayne]

I believe what they saying is Walz was conditionally promoted to the rank of Command Sergeant Major of the First Battalion-125th Field Artillery. That's a whole regiment.

They don't say exactly what the condition is but they seem to imply it's the deployment he didn't go on.

If all that's true Walz should have let his chain of command know to rescind the Command part of Command Sergeant Major when he knew he wasn't going to go. Sergeant Major is a pretty big rank, nothing to be ashamed of at all. Claiming CSM when you didn't fulfill the conditions of promotion sounds pretty serious.

[Rappini]

That explains everything I just checked he is a Demorat. Boot him out he’s a poser.

[poinq]

This is dumb. After 35 years of service you get out at the next promotion. Its done all the time. In the army, in education, in the post office. Its very common. There is no reason whatsoever that a guy who does 35 years can’t leave whenever and for whatever reason.

[Bookshelf]

What the hell, he’s in good company, including Bill Clinton and others who have served in government.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Walz didn’t serve 35 years.

[rlmorel]

This very last line in the report is revealing:

"...A spokesperson for Walz previously said this topic has been covered before and referred Alpha News to a past story where Walz said 'normally this type of partisan political attack only comes from one who’s never worn a uniform'..."

That's a dead giveaway right there.

There are indeed things more egregious than an attack on military service from one who has never worn a uniform:

1.) Being someone who served, and being a modern day Democrat.

2.) Being a modern day Democrat, and trading on your military background.

As far as I am concerned, both of those things are not only far more egregious than an attack on military service from one who has never worn a uniform.

It is why I have a feeling of utter revulsion when I hear the name "Tulsi Gabbard".

[poinq]

You can retire when it best suits you and your family. Everyone does it. If you tell soldiers they have to retire when it best suits the army, you won’t have any soldiers.

[moovova]

The whistleblower (Doug Julin)l is the one that served 35 years, I believe...

“Doug Julin worked his way up to division command sergeant major (CSM) before he retired from the Minnesota National Guard in 2012 after serving 35 years.”

[poinq]

You are right he was 24 years in the army and national guard. Still, he gets to retire when he wants. The army deals with this every day.

[Organic Panic]

Is Alpha News on the same media playbook that does not allow mentioning a democrat’s political affiliation.

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

I don’t know why they omitted that. They sre very pro conservative. Might be because they are mostly Minnesota centered news and they figure that we already know who the enemy is

[Celtic Conservative]

REMF bastard. Walz just wants to tell the troops he’s behind them....as far as is humanly possible.

CC

[ButThreeLeftsDo]

He’s a coward and he proved it during the Flod riots and the “pandemic”.

He’s no leader.