Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steely Tom

I believe Oberlins costs were covered by an insurance policy.


19 posted on 09/25/2022 7:29:54 PM PDT by griswold3 (There are no solutions; there are only trade-offs. – Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: griswold3

Not punitive damages and maybe nothing except legal representation. You cannot go out of your way to get sued and then expect insurance. Negligence leading to a personal injury is one thing. An intentional tort is quite another.


43 posted on 09/25/2022 9:40:36 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: griswold3

Not punitive damages and maybe nothing except legal representation. You cannot go out of your way to get sued and then expect insurance. Negligence leading to a personal injury is one thing. An intentional tort is quite another.


44 posted on 09/25/2022 9:40:37 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: griswold3

Yes, Oberon has liability and tort insurance. Oberlin’s insurance carrier refused to cover the judgement as Oberlin’s acts were malicious, intentional, self-inflicted and outside the scope of their policy. In other words, Oberlin’s did not have clean hands.


48 posted on 09/26/2022 12:37:55 AM PDT by .44 Special (Taimid Buacharch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson