Notice, I’m not talking about compromising, or bipartisan this or that, or anything like that at all.
My whole point is, why say stuff that is blatantly racist and potentially turn off people who might otherwise already agree with you? It makes no sense.
Pointing out someone’s race when they commit a crime, if that crime has nothing to do with their race, is racist.
I'm noticing you posted no examples of when your method of addressing bias against Conservatives in US Residents resulted in Conservative policy strengthening and gains over the last 120 years.
While you claim that you don't compromise, acknowledging the existence of Socialists as non criminals that should have a say in running a Civilized Free Society is the first and largest Compromise.
My whole point is, why say stuff that is blatantly racist and potentially turn off people who might otherwise already agree with you? It makes no sense.
Sure it makes sense, ya don't waste your time on a bunch of Narrative Propagandized Flip-Flops who will bail as soon as someone like you says: Racist!
Pointing out someone’s race when they commit a crime, if that crime has nothing to do with their race, is racist.
No it is not, as the FBI Crime Statistics prove.
Anyone who cites them is called a Racist for citing those true and factual stats, and they can't be racist because they didn't write those stats, and the FBI, bad as they are, does not falsify those stats.
When I post an identification it is simply a statistical group of one.
The Racism is in the eye of my critic, and all the Useful people who cannot logic that out.