I'm noticing you posted no examples of when your method of addressing bias against Conservatives in US Residents resulted in Conservative policy strengthening and gains over the last 120 years.
While you claim that you don't compromise, acknowledging the existence of Socialists as non criminals that should have a say in running a Civilized Free Society is the first and largest Compromise.
My whole point is, why say stuff that is blatantly racist and potentially turn off people who might otherwise already agree with you? It makes no sense.
Sure it makes sense, ya don't waste your time on a bunch of Narrative Propagandized Flip-Flops who will bail as soon as someone like you says: Racist!
Pointing out someone’s race when they commit a crime, if that crime has nothing to do with their race, is racist.
No it is not, as the FBI Crime Statistics prove.
Anyone who cites them is called a Racist for citing those true and factual stats, and they can't be racist because they didn't write those stats, and the FBI, bad as they are, does not falsify those stats.
When I post an identification it is simply a statistical group of one.
The Racism is in the eye of my critic, and all the Useful people who cannot logic that out.
Again, we’re dealing with prejudices vs reality here. Many of these people have conservative values. It’s not smart to alienate them with pointless racist comments, which is what you are doing.
You are also perpetrating the stereotype that conservatives are racist. I’m telling you this in good faith. Your first comment—the one to which I originally responded—is racist and counterproductive, and to use your term “Useful”. It plays right into the hands of the liberals and media.