[Brooklyn Attitude]

The error would be to have a Constitution modified by the current crop of politicians instead of the one written by the Founders.

[Ken H]

“The error would be to have a Constitution modified by the current crop of politicians instead of the one written by the Founders.”

---

It’s already been irreparably distorted by the 17th Amendment and the expansive Commerce Clause.

[qaz123]

You just summed up everything Beck said, in one, very simple sentence.

[central_va]

Only a complete buffoon with terminal normalcy bias would be against an Art V convention.

[Olog-hai]

That’s not the reason for Article V.

[Reily]

An Article V convention can modify the Constitution no more than any other amendment proposed, voted on by Congress & ratified by the states can.

All an article V convention does is bypass Congress. The states still have to ratify any amendment that comes out of an Article V convention.