Replies

I actually posed this question to the cosmologist and author Sean Carroll who has written numerous peer reviewed scientific papers related to the early state of the Universe.

He was quite clear that none of the JWST images disprove or contradict the red shift evidence for the expansion of the Universe after 10E-30 seconds known as the “Big Bang”. This defines the start of Einstein’s General Relativity laws where all the photon energy that has ever been set the coefficients of the Hubble constant and the rate of expansion.

This article mistakenly conflates Alan Guth’s controversial hypothesis for the quantum inflationary period driven by the breaking of the inflaton symmetry prior to 10E-30 seconds with the actual beginning of the Standard Model (U0, SU(2), SU(3)) expansion.

As Dr. Carroll pointed out, all that the JWST images show is that the models of how the early Universe clumped may not be complete and need to be adjusted to reflect our new information.

The expansion of the Universe is well established with decades of peer reviewed scientific data. People who try to convince you otherwise are misleading you.

As explained elsewhere, their understanding of the inflation was drastically overstated, because they expected to find young universes, and what they found was universes looking like our universe and all the others they found, Different types, different shapes but all pretty much the same age. There are no new universes found that are in the embryonic stage which inflation is supposed to prove. None new, so the inflation is non existent.