Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diesel Ram Owner Forced to Scrap Truck Over Deleted Emissions Equipment
The Drive ^ | 9/14/2022 | Caleb Jacobs

Posted on 09/14/2022 1:13:17 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable

A diesel truck owner's battle with the state of New Jersey is leading to the scrapyard. Mike Sebold initially received a letter from the state's Department of Environmental Protection after listing his modified 2008 Ram 2500 on Facebook Marketplace. Officials took issue with the pickup's deleted emissions equipment and, in turn, told Sebold his truck must be returned to stock or taken off the road. But after he decided to turn in his plates and keep it for off-road use, Sebold claims they've forced him to make an appointment with the crusher.

Updated at 1:30 p.m. ET on 09/14/2022: Sebold forwarded screenshots of his email correspondence with the NJ DEP after this article was published. One states that he cannot transfer the truck’s title in any way without returning it to stock. This includes giving it away.

In the other, a department representative explicitly says, “You stated during our conversation that you are unwilling to make repairs to your vehicle. The only other option you have to come into compliance with the NOV and avoid occurring monetary penalties in this matter is to have the truck destroyed at a scrap yard. As I stated in our phone conversation this is not my preferred option as the Department is more interested in having your truck be emissions complaint [sic] than see it destroyed, but nevertheless it’s your property to handle as you see fit.”

The saga started in late July when the New Jersey DEP officially opened correspondence with Sebold. He quickly replied and after a few days of back and forth, he decided against returning the Ram to stock. According to him, it would've cost more than $10,000 to do so, which was more than he felt comfortable spending—especially with the 60-day timeframe the DEP gave him. Sebold says he then de-registered the truck and ran it at a sled pull in Warren County, which convinced him to use it strictly for competition.

It appears that still wasn't enough to satisfy the DEP. Sebold tells me they gave him a deadline of September 25 to add emissions components like the diesel particulate filter back to the truck or have it destroyed. After exhausting seemingly every option to save his pickup without spending thousands on repairs, he elected to comply. At the time of publishing, the truck is set to be crushed Friday, September 16.

A New Jersey DEP agent involved with Sebold's case forwarded me to the department's public information officer. When I asked about the ongoing saga, they replied, "Mr. Sebold has informed the Department that he intends to bring his truck to a scrap yard on Sept. 16 and have it destroyed, although the Department has explained to Mr. Sebold on multiple occasions that the Department would extend the 60-day deadline cited in compliance requirements to give him time to make the necessary repairs to the truck and return it to full New Jersey emissions compliance. These repairs would include returning the vehicle to its original certified emission configuration."

When I asked if Sebold was being forced to crush his Ram despite removing it from the road, the DEP said, "Mr. Sebold has made the decision to scrap his truck, despite DEP offering him other options." But that brings us to the question at the core here—even if the DEP offered to extend the September 25 deadline, is it a choice to destroy a truck when the other option is to spend money you can't spare or don't have to bring it into compliance?

Sebold tells me he's never been visited by a DEP representative in person, only that he believes them to have photos and videos of his truck. This was a key detail for many who claimed government overreach when the state initially contacted Sebold, but New Jersey law is clear about its stance on selling deleted trucks. Simply put, it isn't allowed, and they apparently don't have to see it in person if the seller admits to such modifications in the vehicle's listing.

It won't be over until the truck is crushed or the New Jersey DEP changes its mind and allows Sebold to keep it in one piece. Either way, this won't be the last time we see deleted truck owners duking it out with state governments.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News
KEYWORDS: automotive; diesel; emissions; newjersey; ram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: larrytown

“Or part it out - get something out of it, rather than just scrapping.”

Not an option.


41 posted on 09/14/2022 2:24:42 PM PDT by TexasGator ( Gator in Florids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I got the $800 from carparts.com


42 posted on 09/14/2022 2:26:06 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Since this is NJ, he probably just needs to contact the Sopranos to have it disappear and show up with a new VIN number....


43 posted on 09/14/2022 2:28:25 PM PDT by nascarnation (Let's go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Sucks to be him then - enjoy NJ.


44 posted on 09/14/2022 2:30:25 PM PDT by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

“One states that he cannot transfer the truck’s title in any way without returning it to stock. This includes giving it away.”

Seems to me like NJ can’t do crap if he just takes it across the border and sells it in another state.


45 posted on 09/14/2022 2:43:51 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

NJ would have contacted the FBI to kill him.


46 posted on 09/14/2022 2:46:29 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Biden not only suffers fools and criminals, he appoints them to positions of responsibility. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

Move to South Carolina. They have no yearly inspections.


47 posted on 09/14/2022 2:47:26 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

“he decided to turn in his plates and keep it for off-road use”

Even Ca lets you do this without argument.


48 posted on 09/14/2022 2:48:32 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Nope... Unless you modify the fuel system to squirt more juice there is no difference in particulate output. From the factory they run extremely clean and a particulate filter is not even needed. It is all a scam.


49 posted on 09/14/2022 2:57:51 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

Off road beaters called hunting cars ..... Now banned by NJ Guvern-mint retards. Konstipated killjoys trying to spoil all the fun there is in life. Spit!
What a rip off!


50 posted on 09/14/2022 3:00:26 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

That is a modified fuel system or bad turbo there.


51 posted on 09/14/2022 3:09:01 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
what state isn't going to inspect the emissions equipment to license it there?

Colorado, for one. I just transferred titles and registered three of my out of state vehicles --no emissions inspections or smog tests.

52 posted on 09/14/2022 3:13:14 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (For 'tis the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard., -- Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: larrytown

Doesn’t sound like the NJ commies will let him. He parts it out and they come after him he has a real problem. He sells it out of state, well Meh.


53 posted on 09/14/2022 3:49:25 PM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

“Nope... Unless you modify the fuel system to squirt more juice there is no difference in particulate output. “

Yep! Can you say tuner?


54 posted on 09/14/2022 4:15:00 PM PDT by TexasGator ( Gator in Florids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

“He sells it out of state, well Meh.”

Not “meh” as referenced to NJ.


55 posted on 09/14/2022 4:17:31 PM PDT by TexasGator ( Gator in Florids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

“That is a modified fuel system or bad turbo there.”

Which I am sure he has. We already know he is “tuned” and has straight pipes and does tractor pulls. I bet he has “upgraded” his fuel delivery with the tune.


56 posted on 09/14/2022 4:20:41 PM PDT by TexasGator ( Gator in Florids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
Put it on a trailer, take it out of state, sell. 3 easy steps.

Yep. He could trailer it to Florida and, even if he sold it for a fire-sale price, he'd still be making more than letting the State crush it.

57 posted on 09/14/2022 4:21:48 PM PDT by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Montana’s really good about that.

It’s how I got my ‘92 HMMWV titled. reseller/company bought used at auction, off govt planet orsomewhere, did enough to get them working, powerwashed/cleaned up a bit, got titles from MT which bypassed SF97 off-road restrictions that would’ve kept them from being titled in MD.

But as tempting as it is “aLl tHaT cAtaLytIC cOnVerTer Duz iz ROb tHe EngiNe pOwR! DeRp!”

It’s a “guy” thing”.


58 posted on 09/14/2022 4:25:19 PM PDT by normbal (normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America ‘tween MD and TN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Some counties in TX don’t require emissions, although I don’t know if that also applies to diesels.


59 posted on 09/14/2022 4:29:07 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind
"Nope... Unless you modify the fuel system to squirt more juice there is no difference in particulate output. "

Yep. Dude was into tractor pulls. You can't have a good pull without a lot of smoke!


60 posted on 09/14/2022 4:48:21 PM PDT by TexasGator ( Gator in Florids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson