Yes.
And, as we can see by many comments here, it’s pretty easy to “sell” the idea that the young man was “lucky”. That opens the door to “reasonable” rules allowing adult women to have sex with young men — hey, “everyone’s a winner”. And then, of course, in the interest of fairness, you really have to allow adult men to have sex with female children. And men with boys (almost goes without saying).
This is the sort of slippery slope that the Left thrives on. You can see it a mile away if you look for it. But some folks miss it because they are busy shouting “Attaboy!”
Sexual predators are sexual predators whether male or female.
The double standard of giving women a pass on sexual crime because she’s good looking and the kid is “lucky” is reprehensible.
God’s standards are for sexual purity for BOTH men and women.
And the idea that men are free to be sexually active but women are to remain chaste and pure is hypocrisy at its finest.
Yeah, I know what kind of response this post if going to get from the lack of morals crowd here on FR, but too bad for them. They can have their fun explaining it to God later.