Posted on 09/09/2022 9:01:07 AM PDT by Signalman
WASHINGTON, Sept 9 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge has dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against his 2016 rival Hillary Clinton, saying the former Republican president's allegations that Democrats tried to rig that election by linking his campaign to Russia was an attempt to "flaunt" political grievances that did not belong in court.
In throwing out Trump's lawsuit Thursday night, Judge Donald Middlebrooks of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida said the lawsuit was not seeking "redress for any legal harm" and that the court was "not the appropriate forum" for the former president's complaints.
"He is seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him," Middlebrooks said in his ruling.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
She’ll be in jail any minute now!
Clinton judge from 1997.
How come he didn’t recuse?
A Clinton judge. Where the outrage from media.
Clinton judges, front end Baby Boomer nobody with a Biz degree churning out Leftard decisions on demand
Of course he did. The Feral “judges” might be a bunch of miserable human beings but they are smart enough to know what happens to anyone who crosses the Clintoon Crime Family. That’s why Hillary always has “her daughter Chelsea jogging nearby.” They use her to jog people’s memories about Marcy Park.
It looks like it won’t be long now.
Judge’s ruling here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157/gov.uscourts.flsd.610157.267.0.pdf
CORRUPT JUDGES!! Our DOJ is TOTALLY CORRUPT!
"..."He is seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed that illegally conspired to use the organs of government and state-run media to politically attack and persecute him," Middlebrooks said in his ruling.
Have justice and peace purchased their “get out of town” tickets ?
>> Middlebrooks said in his ruling.
A petulant ruling
That's all we've heard for decades. "No standing to sue" before, during, or after the election.
"Not the appropriate forum" -- take your complaints somewhere else where you can find a sympathetic ear.
Rule of Law!? What crapola.
appeal this shi# ruling.
How is it that democrats are able to judge-shop so successfully, but republicans always end up with democrat appointed judged on their cases?
The law and rule of law works for democrats and rinos. All others need not apply
So, “all’s fair in love and war and politics,” unless you’re a Republican. Democrats are allowed to cheat, lie and steal and Republicans aren’t allowed to challenge anything . . .
Maybe it’s because the Democrats are the evil party and the Republicans are the stupid party.
There needs to be a law that if a suit is dismissed as “no standing”, the judge must declare WHO DOES have standing.
Also, if a case is dismissed as inappropriate in this court, the judge must state where the case should have been held.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.