Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Red herring again. I am not denying any word of Daniel 2:21 whereas you are denying some words. Louis XVI was followed by Napoleon following the pseudo-republican interregnum, remember. In the same way, England’s Charles I was followed by Charles II after Oliver Cromwell’s death. And some kingdoms do not rise back up indeed, such as with Zedekiah after Nebuchadnezzar II conquered Judah. None of that means that somehow God intends humanity to abolish monarchies after several millennia of being ruled by them, which appears to me to be the assertion you are attempting to prove by several logical fallacies.


58 posted on 09/10/2022 2:59:46 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

Not a red herring. An honest question. Which you refuse to answer. Like every other question.

Actually it does EXACTLY mean that. “He sets up kings”, if He doesn’t setup a new king that tells us He doesn’t want one.

I’m not saying what God wants, I leave that up to ego maniacs. I’m pointing out that according to the verse YOU demanded we focus on, if England ends their pointless, powerless, expensive monarchy, that would be God’s will. That’s what your verse says “He removes kings”. If the kings go away, that’s on Him, that’s His call.


59 posted on 09/10/2022 3:07:44 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson