1 posted on
09/06/2022 5:02:31 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: BenLurkin
“the smallest molecule in the universe”
That was my first guess before I even read the article.
2 posted on
09/06/2022 5:04:18 PM PDT by
Samurai_Jack
(This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
To: BenLurkin
This hydrogen thingy is super high tech—hope the woke zombies at NASA can figure it out...
;-)
3 posted on
09/06/2022 5:06:10 PM PDT by
cgbg
(Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
To: BenLurkin
4 posted on
09/06/2022 5:06:13 PM PDT by
Yossarian
To: BenLurkin
This is something to keep in mind when folks dream of hydrogen powered cars.
5 posted on
09/06/2022 5:06:55 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX!)
To: BenLurkin
built by lowest bidder contracts?
6 posted on
09/06/2022 5:07:01 PM PDT by
Craftmore
To: BenLurkin
Doesn’t say much for NASA’s testing regimen.
To: BenLurkin; CodeToad
The guys who built the Saturn V and the Space Shuttle got this to work.
Apparently it’s now a lost art.
9 posted on
09/06/2022 5:09:36 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: BenLurkin
I grew up with the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs.
60 years later and we’re still using rockets.
Sigh.
10 posted on
09/06/2022 5:10:20 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
To: BenLurkin
It’s not like NASA has been using liquid hydrogen as a fuel for more than fifty years or anything.
11 posted on
09/06/2022 5:10:33 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: BenLurkin
Never worked with liquid hydrogen but liquid helium is difficult.
To: BenLurkin
13 posted on
09/06/2022 5:13:54 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: BenLurkin; Daffynition; dfwgator
But hydrogen—the smallest molecule in the universe—often finds its way through even the tiniest of openings. 
14 posted on
09/06/2022 5:15:09 PM PDT by
Ezekiel
(🆘️𓊹 𓌃 "Come fly with US". Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with Mars ♂️)
To: BenLurkin
Are we even capable of completing a manned moon mission anymore? I have doubts.
16 posted on
09/06/2022 5:19:06 PM PDT by
cdcdawg
(Hoes mad! LOL! )
To: BenLurkin
17 posted on
09/06/2022 5:27:08 PM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: BenLurkin
If hydrogen (H2) is like helium, it will leak out of everything, even a steel tank.
18 posted on
09/06/2022 5:28:35 PM PDT by
LukeL
To: BenLurkin
Because $4.1B is not enough, need another $5B. Or you could just give Elon $1B and be done with it.
19 posted on
09/06/2022 5:39:28 PM PDT by
JoSixChip
(2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
To: BenLurkin
The Engineers who designed/built the Apollo rockets did it with sliderules.
22 posted on
09/06/2022 5:53:07 PM PDT by
PROCON
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: BenLurkin
They should fuel the rockets with helium instead of hydrogen. Much safer.
To: BenLurkin
NASA handled LH2 just fine for Saturn V upper stages.
NASA handled LH2 just fine for STS.
Euros handle LH2 just fine for Ariane 5 and Ariane 6
ULA handles LH2 just fine for Delta IV and Delta IV heavy
ULA handles LH2 just fine for Atlas V upper stage
It’s not like LH2 is some kind of new, untested fuel that nobody is really familiar with ...
29 posted on
09/06/2022 6:08:20 PM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: BenLurkin
31 posted on
09/06/2022 6:11:12 PM PDT by
WMarshal
(Neocons and leftards are the same species of vicious rat.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
