To: ransomnote
I have a law license. Not sure one needs such to recognize obvious grounds for appeal.
5 posted on
09/06/2022 3:56:23 PM PDT by
jimfree
(My 19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: jimfree
"Not sure one needs such to recognize obvious grounds for appeal."Not a lawyer, but I play one on FR, so let me state the obvious...
- Not an insurrection.
- It's a county position in a state, not a federal position.
- I doubt there was evidence that he was part of the planning for Jan 6.
- And I bet he wasn't even armed. How is that an insurrection and not a peaceful protest.
- And cops opened the gates, the doors and waved people in.
- The judge's comment sounds like the judge is targeting Trump.
- The insurrection law was civil war related, not sure it applies to anything else.
How did I do?
15 posted on
09/06/2022 4:13:46 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: jimfree
and had I read more of the comments:
- He's not been convicted on insurrection just trespass.
17 posted on
09/06/2022 4:18:15 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: jimfree
I don’t think the insurrection language is important. Isn’t the relevant fact that there was a conviction on a felony charge? I’m not siding against your comment, just not sure about grounds for appeal.
23 posted on
09/06/2022 4:22:27 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson