To: nickcarraway
>> At only 9.3 square feet (8 square meters)
Uh... what??? My shower is bigger than 9.3 sq ft. And 8 m^2 is not close to 9.3 ft^2
A “technical” article that gets it THIS wrong blows its credibility bigly.
13 posted on
09/05/2022 9:37:11 PM PDT by
Nervous Tick
(Truth is not hate speech.)
To: Nervous Tick
This would have to be a 3 x 3 bathroom with a ladder to take you to second floor kitchen to then take a ladder to the bedroom on the 3rd floor.
17 posted on
09/05/2022 9:41:20 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: Nervous Tick
>> At only 9.3 square feet (8 square meters) Uh... what??? My shower is bigger than 9.3 sq ft. And 8 m^2 is not close to 9.3 ft^2 A “technical” article that gets it THIS wrong blows its credibility bigly.Should read: "At only 9.3 feet square (8 square meters)."
8 square meters is roughly equivalent to a square, 9.3 feet by 9.3 feet.
Tradesmen will sometimes describe areas in this fashion.
Regards,
37 posted on
09/05/2022 11:06:38 PM PDT by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: Nervous Tick
A square 8 m^2 building has a wall length of ~9.3 ft, which is what I think they meant to say.
63 posted on
09/06/2022 6:20:09 AM PDT by
eclecticEel
("The petty man forsakes what lies within his power and longs for what lies with Heaven." - Xunzi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson