Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2022 10:59:38 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

May be the problem Florida and Texas have?


2 posted on 09/01/2022 11:09:43 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Ah, the X-File’s elusive shapeshifting planet!


3 posted on 09/01/2022 11:18:01 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Figures )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Earth ๐ŸŒŽ๐ŸŒ?


4 posted on 09/01/2022 11:26:57 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

In general, red dwarf stars generate significantly less heat and visible light than our own sun.

I am thinking the habitable zone of a red dwarf solar system must also be significantly smaller.


5 posted on 09/02/2022 1:37:33 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

San Francisco 50 years ago, then San Francisco now. New York in Giuliani years, and then New York in Wilhelm years. Chicago ...


6 posted on 09/02/2022 3:13:13 AM PDT by ToxicMasculinity ("Free country"? Good morning, Rip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

[...likely high radiation environment doesnโ€™t bode well for any type of habitability on this world]

So they only found another uninhabitable planet?


7 posted on 09/02/2022 4:18:17 AM PDT by Farmerbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bullshito!


8 posted on 09/02/2022 4:43:58 AM PDT by 55Ford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I dated a woman like that once.


10 posted on 09/02/2022 4:49:03 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker; All

Why would the “habital zone” not be essentially spherical shape?

(The definition of “habital zone” seems pretty squirrely to me, anyway.)


11 posted on 09/02/2022 5:10:00 AM PDT by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
A circle is a special case of an ellipse. All circles are ellipses but not all ellipses are circles.

Most orbits start out as non-circular ellipses but all orbits end up that way because no celestial body is perfectly spherical. Tiny deviations from a spherical shape (or even irregularities in gravitational pull caused by nutation, or variability in composition) act irregularly on the path of anything orbiting that body, and over millennia take orbits out of circular. The only satellites with relatively circular orbits are artificial ones that receive frequent course adjustments.

A planet outside any habitable zone is (theoretically) uninhabitable but just because a planet is in a habitable zone doesn't mean it's habitable, only that it's (strictly speaking) not un-inhabitable.

13 posted on 09/02/2022 7:31:20 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson