Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death
WND ^ | 08/31/2022 | Art Moore

Posted on 09/01/2022 7:48:42 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Jan_Sobieski
The key with the Ivermectin studies is it really best helps at only the earliest, or before, as a preventative.

Other medical items or supplements are needed for later stages, especially if COVID is effectively gone, but it's now your body fighting itself. Steroids and a possible antibacterial medicine (for a possible secondary infection) can break this better at day 10 of a worsening infection.

21 posted on 09/01/2022 8:19:52 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

A collection of Ivermectin studies is available, here:

https://c19ivermectin.com/


22 posted on 09/01/2022 8:22:29 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Even I am shocked by this ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡@mercnews is reporting the data is from 8 mice

How did we go from 40k person RCTs to 8 mice... seems kinda insane

As you alter spike, you might get Less myocarditis, but you also might get More, who knows. 8 mice?https://t.co/PgzCIeHnKP pic.twitter.com/Ia6cpaU4p2โ€” Vinay Prasad, MD MPH ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ“ท (@VPrasadMDMPH) August 31, 2022


23 posted on 09/01/2022 8:24:29 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AbolishCSEU
Where can we get it in capsule form without an RX? We did the paste last December. I tolerated it better than hubby.

FLCCC website listing pharmacies that sell ivermectin w/out a prescription:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/pharmacies/?filter_13=NO&filter_14=NO&filter_15=NO&filter_16=YES&filter_12=Pennsylvania&filter_4_6=&filter_4_4=&mode=all

P.S. The referenced website contains filters that you can set.

P.S.S. I use the 13mg tables. They are small, chewable and have a nice flavor. Easy to swallow/eat.

24 posted on 09/01/2022 8:24:42 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Yes FDA should be firewalled.

Walensky says we can't wait for human data, have to rely on mice

This is y political appointees can't decide

If u have election in Nov, u'd approve anything to lower cases right before the vote. Who cares about safety/ severe dx

FDA shd be firewalledhttps://t.co/EyFjZ64c4W pic.twitter.com/lR1OI8Cuqqโ€” Vinay Prasad, MD MPH ๐ŸŽ™๏ธ๐Ÿ“ท (@VPrasadMDMPH) August 31, 2022


25 posted on 09/01/2022 8:26:56 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

Figures. No one in NYS nor ships to NYS.


26 posted on 09/01/2022 8:34:56 AM PDT by AbolishCSEU (Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fury

I agree there is almost no chance of it killing you with or without.


27 posted on 09/01/2022 8:37:45 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
Under a new Democrat/Socialist law, if you're a doctor and you say this in California you will be sanctioned by the state's medical board and may even lose your license to practice medicine.

In California, "medical science" has been replaced completely by "political science" ... as it has throughout much of America.

28 posted on 09/01/2022 8:40:28 AM PDT by glennaro (Live life unbullied and unafraid. Choose to ignore or fight the irrationality that surrounds you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

yep

got a prescription just in case

cleared up my chest in 48 hours


29 posted on 09/01/2022 8:46:20 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AbolishCSEU

check FLCCC

dr pierre kory and peter mccollough’s website

they have protocols and a doctor database of who will prescribe

they use compound pharmacies because it is prescribed by weight


30 posted on 09/01/2022 8:49:41 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

I had one of my dogs at the clinic recently for her annual exam. The Vet tech asked what my dogs take for heartworm prevention and I told her Ivermectin. She smiled, winked at me, and said, “Ivermectin is good for a lot of things”.


31 posted on 09/01/2022 8:55:38 AM PDT by Tennessee Conservative (@Shegens on Truth Social ๐Ÿ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

It could have saved over 900,000 people


32 posted on 09/01/2022 8:56:39 AM PDT by revivaljoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

This doctor—who is an endocrinologist, not an infectious disease doc—has a history of publishing highly questionable “research.”

I read the study. It was not a randomized controlled trial; participants were choosing whether to take ivermectin or not. Since the participants were self-selected and the study was not randomized, it is impossible to say that differences in mortality were due to routine use of ivermectin.

The participants who took ivermectin also were more likely to have preexisting conditions, such as diabetes, which are known to increase fatality from Covid. Thus, they were more likely to be worried about dying from Covid. So they were more likely to volunteer to take the ivermectin and also to minimize their chances of being exposed to Covid.

What the study showed was not that ivermectin has an effect on Covid survival (in randomized studies, it does not), but that people who are more worried about Covid are more likely to take measures to avoid it.

Beware of medical misinformation. It was used against Trump (who no longer is president, largely because he was blamed for the misinformation) and it is being used against conservatives. The left would love for enough of us to die from Covid that they no longer have to cheat to win elections. Personally, I have no intention of helping the left.

Prevention is *always* better than waiting until you catch the disease and hoping something will cure you.


33 posted on 09/01/2022 9:06:00 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

The ability to look down the economy needed a few more deaths as a justification. They didnโ€™t want people to survive in their war, and everyone knows that people die in wars.


34 posted on 09/01/2022 9:09:09 AM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
It was not a randomized controlled trial; participants were choosing whether to take ivermectin or not. Since the participants were self-selected and the study was not randomized, it is impossible to say that differences in mortality were due to routine use of ivermectin

This won't matter. When you've drank the kool-aid for a particular issue, study protocol is just a minor nuisance that gets in the way of the results you want that study to prove.

35 posted on 09/01/2022 9:22:56 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

You wouldn’t want a cheap, effective cure to get in the way of a multi-BILLION dollar fraud, and all of the power and control resulting from a MANDATED “vaccine”.....


36 posted on 09/01/2022 9:34:59 AM PDT by G Larry (Biden: Ignorant and Dishonest Before he was Senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jan/28/facebook-posts/study-brazil-ivermectin-covid-19-prevention-flawed/


37 posted on 09/01/2022 9:42:47 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Ivermectin also reduces the chances of contracting the Fauci Flu, and reduces the severity of the symptoms if you do catch it.

They mocked Dr. Zelenko (RIP) for hawking it, but his prophecy is coming true.


38 posted on 09/01/2022 9:44:40 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury

It’s correct!

Better run out and get the updated version, furry!!


39 posted on 09/01/2022 9:59:19 AM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a โ€œconspiracy theoryโ€ in 2020 is now fact. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski
Brazilian research scientist Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani said via Twitter that his study in his home country showed a "dose-response effect," meaning that "the more you used, the more protection you had."

And Twitter promptly suspended his account for disseminating false information.

40 posted on 09/01/2022 9:59:39 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (In time of peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson