[gibsonguy]

I wish there was one news source that we could trust in this war but there is not.

[Chunga85]

“I wish there was one news source that we could trust in this war but there is not.”

History is a reliable news source. If there was a history of US interventions of this sort that resulted in any legitimate benefit to anyone we’d be able to cite it, and model this one after that one.

There is not.

[Kazan]

There sources you can trust:

The Duran/Alex Christoforou, Alexander Mercouris, The New Atlas. Sonar 21.com with Larry Johnson, Moon of Alabama.com and Gonzalo Lira to name a few.

[Huskrrrr]

“I wish there was one news source that we could trust in this war”

Sky News seems to be better than most.

[ought-six]

“I wish there was one news source that we could trust in this war but there is not.”

It’s called disinformation, which is part of psyops; all nations practice it, especially during war. Russians are masters of disinformation; indeed, some others may appear amateurish compared with the Russians.

[hinckley buzzard]

There is no need to jump to conclusions based on daily press releases. Reserve judgment for a while, the truth will surface soon enough. Clinging to daily drivel like this is a fool’s errand.

[thegagline]

Here is a more evenhanded source which is updated daily:

https://www.understandingwar.org/

[Srednik]

There is an Austrian analyst on YouTube.

Sky News from Australia has a good one.

A UK general gives good reports also on YouTube.

Turns out TheEnforcer on YouTube’s (except for Monday) reporting has been very accurate.

Note how the lamestream news is nowhere in Srednik’s list.

If you know the language, RagnarockPrivyet on Telegram is a good source.

ELOQUENT is the fact that six months into Russian invasion, Ukraine stands. Slava Ukraina!