Just making an example out of this lightweight. When one makes assertions at this site they should be prepared to defend them with facts. Especially a significant assertion that single celled life evolved into humans.
Whether one is religious or not that is an incredible assertion. If one can’t defend it then they don’t understand the assertion and cannot explain it. They have just been brainwashed. No different than the climate change zealots.
Says our science denying featherweight while looking into a fun-house curved mirror which reflects his own image as much bigger & stronger than reality admits.
plain talk: "When one makes assertions at this site they should be prepared to defend them with facts.
Especially a significant assertion that single celled life evolved into humans."
Curiously, I never made that particular assertion, it's just one you projected as something I might well say, and then you went berserk demanding I defend something you said!
Who is the "lightweight" here?
plain talk: "Whether one is religious or not that is an incredible assertion.
If one can’t defend it then they don’t understand the assertion and cannot explain it."
Why would I want to defend your statement?
plain talk: "They have just been brainwashed.
No different than the climate change zealots."
"Brainwashed" I think describes yourself, plain talk.
Having never studied real science, having no true ideas about how science works or what it says, you announce to the world that science is "lightweight" and you own the only true knowledge.
Well, I doubt that -- instead, your "knowledge" seems to consist of denying what is observed and substituting for it what can never be seen.