Oh? So NOW you are naming a specific term you want me to defend? "Macro evolution"?
That term has your panties all twisted up?
And so you are certain I can't defend the term, right?
What if I said, "there's no such thing as 'macro-evolution' "?
There isn't really, you know, it's all just micro-evolution repeated over and over and over, ad infinitum.
After millions of repetitions of micro-evolution, the accumulated changes can add up.
That's what the physical evidence suggests.
I am giving you a chance to stop making a fool out of yourself and enlighten us lowly ones. I know it’s hard for you to have to actually defend this nonsense since you apparently surround yourselves with brainwashed people who all accept the macro evolution group think. Just like the climate change zealots. Only here we don’t suffer fools.
Provide just one example of physical evidence - that a single celled creature evolved into a human. It is a reasonable request since you made the assertion.