I agree, a “must listen.” The Fox hosts did not interrupt or argue. They posed questions, asked follow-ups, and let the man make his very cogent argument. And they didn’t have another talking head there to bluster over the speaker. A good legal argument made to educate me and anybody who listened. Nobody defended the DOJ or Biden or White House legal counsel. The headline is full-on drama queen with no basis in fact. Hate on Fox all you want, but you won’t find much to be mad about in this clip
You must not have listened to the entire clip. Yes, Mike Davis was allowed to speak uninterrupted. However, after his cogent explanation referencing law and precedent as to why the court order was illegal - Ms. Smith seemed oblivious and reverted to AG and FBI talking points.
Fox is neither balanced or objective IMHO.
BINGO! The fox-hating akksholes are out front on this. The only thing she pursued was the fact that Mike made an assertion that the only reason Garland went to the rat-fested judge, and not the DOJ legal group, was because Garland wanted to be sure they would be affirmed on this raid. She simply inquired, “Do you know this as a fact?” that Garland intentionally went to the rat judge to get the legal go-ahead. That’s all she pursued, and which was a good follow-up. Idiot anti-fockers on this site. spit.