Posted on 08/25/2022 6:40:10 PM PDT by ransomnote
I was coming back from a long day in NH doing renovations and driving through Gardner, MA saw two people (outside) walking down the sidewalk with masks on.
-SB
https://t.me/patelpatriot/3927 aug 20
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/the-curious-case-of-jinhua-konnech
Investigation Into U.S. Election Software Company Uncovers Chinese Coders
A deep dive into a Michigan election company’s patents, employees, domain registrations, and internet archives reveals an alarming Chinese connection.
31.2K
. WWG1WGA !
https://justhuman.substack.com/p/templates?sd=pf
Templates
When FBI Raids are actually good news. aug 24
Precedent
“Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge’s personal views.
If the facts or issues of a case differ from those in a previous case, the previous case cannot be precedent. The Supreme Court in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc. reiterated that “[q]uestions which merely lurk on the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as . . . precedent.” Therefore, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues, given the particular facts, that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.”
Therefore, given the particular facts, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.
The Raid.
On the morning of August 8th, 2022, Mar-a-Lago, the residence of President Donald J. Trump, sometimes called the “Winter White House,” was raided by a team of FBI agents executing at least one search warrant (and possibly more than one).
We first learned of this raid from President Trump himself.
(IMAGE)
Less than six hours later, President Trump posted this video on Truth Social.
It’s noteworthy that it was Trump himself who informed us of the raid. There were no leaks to the media ahead of time nor during the execution of the warrant, and by the time he posted his statement, the FBI had more or less come and gone from the property. The Corrupt Media had completely missed out on the opportunity for footage they have been lusting to get for over five years. Lulz.
On the day of the raid, Dan Scavino made this one Truth:
(IMAGE)
...MORE..
https://t.me/patelpatriot/3925
Patel Patriot
Forwarded from
Just Human ️️️
“The government keeps way too many secrets, the Biden administration asserts. The sprawling spy community — made up of 18 separate intelligence agencies — sees it quite differently.
But despite differing worldviews, the White House is quietly gearing up to try to pierce the veil, according to eight government officials and secrecy experts and internal documents.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/23/white-house-war-on-secrecy-00053226
https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/52078
NOW - Biden’s debut midterm rally disrupted by protester:
“You stole the election!”
@disclosetv
2.6K
Know your Nautical terminology
Receiver of Wreck
A government official whose duty is to give owners of shipwrecks the opportunity to retrieve their property and ensure that law-abiding finders of wrecks receive an appropriate reward. In the UK, according to section 255 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995, wreck includes "jetsam, flotsam, lagan or derelict".
The Act does not define these terms, but they may be understood as follows:
Flotsam are goods lost from a ship which has sunk or otherwise perished which are recoverable because they have floated.
Jetsam are goods cast overboard (jettisoned) in order to lighten a vessel which is in danger of sinking, even if they ultimately perish.
Derelict is property which has been abandoned and deserted at sea by those who were in charge without any hope of recovering it. This includes vessels and cargo.
Lagan (or ligan) are goods cast overboard from a ship, buoyed so that they can be recovered later.
In 1997, nearly five million bits of Lego fell into the sea when a huge wave hit the container ship Tokio Express, washing 62 containers overboard. These derelict Legos are still washing ashore on the beaches of Cornwall & Devon in southwest England.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Oh wow! That’s one flying cat!
🐸 “ribbit”
Actor Shia LaBeouf said he converted to Christianity while shooting his upcoming film “Padre Pio” and has become a member of the Roman Catholic Church.
LaBeouf revealed his conversion in an interview released Thursday with Word on Fire Catholic Ministries’ Bishop Robert Barron.
The actor first engaged with the church while living with a monastery of Franciscan Capuchin friars in order to better understand the late mystic St. Padre Pio, whom LaBeouf portrays in the upcoming movie.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/shia-labeouf-converts-catholicism-studying-padre-pio-movie
Thank you for all your hard work and pings.
Appreciate it.
TNX BOSS
SS1
Snag
More:
“
As the media machine spun into action, eager to write their mawkish pieces repeating the same tired, weak, abrading narrative of “tHe wAlLs aRe cLoSiNg iN,” anons going through Scavino’s posts on Truth Social noticed that he had given us a subtle heads up on the raid just 3 days prior:
The obvious nod to Trump being the 45th President on the door (in gold no less)…the less obvious nod of Trump being the future 47th President in the time stamp…and the door indicating someone was about to knock and/or open it? There are no coincidences.
We would later learn that the search warrant(s) for Mar-a-Lago had been signed by Magistrate Judge Reinhart later that same day.
Just Human
Subscribe
17
Templates
When FBI Raids are actually good news.
Just Human
Aug 24
75
6
Precedent
“Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge’s personal views.
If the facts or issues of a case differ from those in a previous case, the previous case cannot be precedent. The Supreme Court in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc. reiterated that “[q]uestions which merely lurk on the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as . . . precedent.” Therefore, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues, given the particular facts, that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.”
Therefore, given the particular facts, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.
Source
The Raid.
On the morning of August 8th, 2022, Mar-a-Lago, the residence of President Donald J. Trump, sometimes called the “Winter White House,” was raided by a team of FBI agents executing at least one search warrant (and possibly more than one).
We first learned of this raid from President Trump himself.
Source
Less than six hours later, President Trump posted this video on Truth Social.
It’s noteworthy that it was Trump himself who informed us of the raid. There were no leaks to the media ahead of time nor during the execution of the warrant, and by the time he posted his statement, the FBI had more or less come and gone from the property. The Corrupt Media had completely missed out on the opportunity for footage they have been lusting to get for over five years. Lulz.
On the day of the raid, Dan Scavino made this one Truth:
As the media machine spun into action, eager to write their mawkish pieces repeating the same tired, weak, abrading narrative of “tHe wAlLs aRe cLoSiNg iN,” anons going through Scavino’s posts on Truth Social noticed that he had given us a subtle heads up on the raid just 3 days prior:
Source
The obvious nod to Trump being the 45th President on the door (in gold no less)…the less obvious nod of Trump being the future 47th President in the time stamp…and the door indicating someone was about to knock and/or open it? There are no coincidences.
We would later learn that the search warrant(s) for Mar-a-Lago had been signed by Magistrate Judge Reinhart later that same day.
The former President is quite well protected; to my knowledge he uses both private security and the Secret Service. Any “raid” of his property would HAVE to be coordinated with his security teams. No question about it. The LAST thing any involved party would want is some kind of incident between private security, Secret Service, and the FBI. So there had to have been SOME foreknowledge, and such coordination has since been confirmed, but for Scavino to post the hint with the door, before the search warrant was even signed? That really makes the mind wonder…
Magistrate Judge Reinhart also signed all of these orders on August 5th:
Two search warrants, a telephone records order, and a sealed (misspelled “Seald”) pen register order.
Just Human
Subscribe
17
Templates
When FBI Raids are actually good news.
Just Human
Aug 24
75
6
Precedent
“Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts. Some judges have stated that precedent ensures that individuals in similar situations are treated alike instead of based on a particular judge’s personal views.
If the facts or issues of a case differ from those in a previous case, the previous case cannot be precedent. The Supreme Court in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc. reiterated that “[q]uestions which merely lurk on the record, neither brought to the attention of the court nor ruled upon, are not to be considered as . . . precedent.” Therefore, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues, given the particular facts, that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.”
Therefore, given the particular facts, a prior decision serves as precedent only for issues that the court explicitly considered in reaching its decision.
Source
The Raid.
On the morning of August 8th, 2022, Mar-a-Lago, the residence of President Donald J. Trump, sometimes called the “Winter White House,” was raided by a team of FBI agents executing at least one search warrant (and possibly more than one).
We first learned of this raid from President Trump himself.
Source
Less than six hours later, President Trump posted this video on Truth Social.
It’s noteworthy that it was Trump himself who informed us of the raid. There were no leaks to the media ahead of time nor during the execution of the warrant, and by the time he posted his statement, the FBI had more or less come and gone from the property. The Corrupt Media had completely missed out on the opportunity for footage they have been lusting to get for over five years. Lulz.
On the day of the raid, Dan Scavino made this one Truth:
As the media machine spun into action, eager to write their mawkish pieces repeating the same tired, weak, abrading narrative of “tHe wAlLs aRe cLoSiNg iN,” anons going through Scavino’s posts on Truth Social noticed that he had given us a subtle heads up on the raid just 3 days prior:
Source
The obvious nod to Trump being the 45th President on the door (in gold no less)…the less obvious nod of Trump being the future 47th President in the time stamp…and the door indicating someone was about to knock and/or open it? There are no coincidences.
We would later learn that the search warrant(s) for Mar-a-Lago had been signed by Magistrate Judge Reinhart later that same day.
The former President is quite well protected; to my knowledge he uses both private security and the Secret Service. Any “raid” of his property would HAVE to be coordinated with his security teams. No question about it. The LAST thing any involved party would want is some kind of incident between private security, Secret Service, and the FBI. So there had to have been SOME foreknowledge, and such coordination has since been confirmed, but for Scavino to post the hint with the door, before the search warrant was even signed? That really makes the mind wonder…
Magistrate Judge Reinhart also signed all of these orders on August 5th:
Two search warrants, a telephone records order, and a sealed (misspelled “Seald”) pen register order.
We do not know if all of these are related to the raid on Mar-a-Lago, but it is reasonable to keep that possibility in mind. The first one, 9:22-mj-08332, is the Mar-a-Lago raid for which we have the most documents unsealed, including the search warrant and property receipt. It is also the one that we are expecting to get a partially redacted affidavit from in the near future (provided there are not further appeals on that motion, which there likely will be).
Here are links to the dockets for anyone who wants to keep track:
United States v. Sealed Search Warrant (9:22-mj-08332)
United States v. Application and Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703 (d) re: Telephone Records (9:22-mj-08334)
United States v. Seald Pen Register (9:22-mj-08335) (still mispelled)
United States v. Sealed Search Warrant (9:22-mj-08338)
The last search warrant, Case 9:22-mj-08338, is still restricted as of this writing, but check out the activity on the docket and the parties:
All of it is restricted/sealed for now, and the judge ruled to keep it that way. One difference between this case and the one that is known to be about Mar-a-Lago is that they are out of two different US Attorney’s Offices, but both went across Judge Reinhart’s desk on August 5th.
Like I said, we do not know if this case is related to the Mar-a-Lago raid, but it’s worth watching to see if it is.
,.....(info about 15 boxes to NARA & docs already declassified)
Let’s take a look at the search warrant and the property receipt which were unsealed on or about August 12th. It is specifically for the premises of Mar-a-Lago, not a person. The search is restricted to rooms in use by FPOTUS (Former President of The United States),
“45 Office.” See that?
Now recall the Dan Scavino Truth which was sent almost a full 12 HOURS before this document was even signed!
No coincidences.
How did Dan know?
Well, Dan knew because Trump knew.
How did Trump know?
I suspect because he, in large part, set this whole thing up. In order to set a precedent.
Back to the unsealed search warrant…
Here we have the potential violations that the still-sealed (as of this writing) affidavit must speak to:
18 U.S. Code § 793 is the Espionage Act.
18 U.S. Code § 2071 18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation of records/documents/items belonging to a clerk or official of the US Governmentt.
18 U.S. Code § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.
The statutes regarding classification do not apply to the President as he has the power to declassify whatever he wishes and to do so simply by saying so. He can even do so with a simple Truth or a Tweet!
He can also issue broad declassification authorizations such as he did in this Tweet:
The media is pretending that this isn’t the case, that Presidents can’t do these things, but ignore them. Instead, let’s ask some questions:
Can you imagine President Trump violating ANY of these statutes?
I cannot.
Can you imagine any of President Trump’s enemies violating these statutes?
Oh, I can easily imagine that. I’m pretty damn sure they did violate these statutes and more.
If Trump cannot and/or would not be in violation of these statutes, then who are the REAL targets of this raid?
I have some ideas.
And who would have evidence of such violations and where might such evidence be found?
Hmmm…
.....(info about filter teams, special masters )
Precedents
This raid on Mar-a-Lago…the filter team, the request to appoint a special master…this is ALL such good news.
Think BIG PICTURE.
We now have precedents set for search warrants being served on:
Major Media (Project Veritas)
A President’s Former Attorney (Cohen)
A Former President’s Attorney (Rudy)
A Former President’s Residence (Trump)
Filter team and Special Master used in each.
It’s a TEMPLATE.
Template- a gauge, pattern, or mold; something that establishes or serves as a pattern.
A template for how to go after the Clintons, Obama, their attorneys, and the media who assisted them in their crimes against the United States and We the People.
The FBI raids were never about “getting” Rudy or “getting PV,” and this Mar-a-Lago raid is not about “getting” Trump.
Contrary to popular ConInc narratives, the FBI does indeed go after bad guys. Regularly. As a rule, even.
The corruption in the FBI is the exception. And one that is being investigated by...
Durham.
That’s not to say that anti-FBI narratives are not important.
I believe they are crucially important.
Because I believe that the amount of hate the FBI is getting now is proportional to the amount of justice the FBI is going to dish out against HRC and her cohorts.
We are building up a wall around the FBI, a narrative defense, that will insulate them from future attacks when indictments against deep state politicians, corrupt media, and their cohorts are unsealed.
When Marc Elias is raided, when HRC is raided, when the NYT is raided, we will be cheering the FBI.
And we will reflect on this Mar-a-Lago raid as good news.
“
| |||||||||||
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
