Posted on 08/23/2022 5:47:17 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
In Congress, where legislation is drafted, debated and enacted, clear and concise definitions are of paramount importance. As military aircrews increasingly encounter unidentified flying objects (UFOs), lawmakers recently made several striking revisions to the definition of “UFO.” Key among them: The explosive implication that some UFOs have non-human origins.
As first reported by researcher Douglas Johnson, a draft bill approved unanimously by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence rebrands UFOs as “unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.” Expanding the definition to include objects in space and under the oceans significantly broadens the scope of a muscular new office tasked by Congress with investigating UFOs.
The revised definition of “UFO” also includes “transmedium” objects which, according to lawmakers, “transition between space and the atmosphere, or between the atmosphere and bodies of water.”
In short, members of a key national security-focused committee believe that objects of unknown origin are demonstrating remarkably advanced technology by moving seamlessly between space, air and water. A report accompanying the legislation notes that “transmedium threats to United States national security are expanding exponentially.”
It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence. Perhaps members have seen the classified sensor data that prompted former President Trump’s director of national intelligence to state that UFOs exhibit “technologies that we don’t have [and] that we are not capable of defending against” (among several other eyebrow-raising comments).
Most strikingly, Congress’s new definition of “UFO” excludes “man-made” objects.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Spellcheck has embarrassed me many times. I’d rather make my own mistakes.
The only other beings mentioned in the Bible--which I take as authoritative--are cherubim and seraphim, and nowhere are they described as leaving the heavenly realm.
demons is another confusing term
Not at all. They are the rebellious angels whom God cast from heaven.
The Bible isn't particularly clear here.
The Bible is perfectly clear here. It is replete with numerous earthly appearances of angels and demons.
Yep and that proves the point - who’d want to make contact with people holding that mind set?
I can see that you are one of those self-righteous Bible experts who don’t actually connect with others except to puff yourself up.;-)
On the subject of "angels"...I won't even bother.
Harry Reid attacks from the grave.
He was the first to leak this.
You make me sound so odious that I don't want to have anything to do with myself. Thank you for warning me about me.
Should I commit suicide? No, life goes on after spiritual death, and I would still be me.
All puffed up and nowhere to go....
I’m this heightened interest will be accompanied by more government programs and funding, along with tons of corporate welfare for defense contractors and the surveillance state.
Seeing grown men giddy over a childish fascination with flying saucers is amusing, and just proof that some people never grow up, even Navy pilots.
Could you please pass the eye bleach?
Your comment just brought to mind all those Bible study groups and Sunday school classes whose fascination with wonderful mysteries of the Bible was snuffed out by a Bible know-it-all who had all the answers.
As an aside, there was an old joke about this. You've probably heard it.
A man begged God to forgive him for his lack of humility. He said, "Lord, I know I need to be humbler. But it is hard to be humble when a feller is as smart and good-looking as me...and knows the Bible as well as I do."
Best wishes,
Dan
I think you are confusing me with someone else.
I am listening to Curt Jaimungal’s March 13, 2022 interview of Elizondo and Cahill.
While they probably think they have very little in common with Terence McKenna they have in fact drifted into his world.
https://podbay.fm/p/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal
McKenna argued that a drug (DMT) let him see a million “impossible” things that showed that all human cultures were artificial constructs—and all of them got most everything wrong.
Once you open that door it is impossible to close it—and that fact is more important than the details of the million impossible things.
Curt's interview with Garry Nolan and Lex Fridman's interview with Garry were also very interesting.
Speaking of Terence McKenna, I saw a video discussion the other day on youtube between McKenna and John Mack HERE. Unbelievable.
Thanks for the link—I will check it out...
Great link—I enjoyed it.
I have one for you:
https://podbay.fm/p/that-ufo-podcast
Scroll down to the Wilson/Davis memo discussion with Joe Murgia, Part 1 and 2. This memo was put in the Congressional Record by Congressman Gallagher, R, Wisconsin.
The text of the memo if you have not seen it:
https://www.congress.gov/117/meeting/house/114761/documents/HHRG-117-IG05-20220517-SD001.pdf
This is amazing stuff.
Wilson denies everything—but who knows what he will say if Congress gives him national security oath immunity and puts him under oath.
Very familiar with the Wilson memo (including Gallager's insertion into Congressional hearing, Garry Nolan's comments to various podcasters, and Wilson's questionable denial).
As you imply, Wilson is saying all that he can say, given the government's position and his probable NDA.
I watched a podcast last night with Jim Semivan and he was, as usual, honest and forthright about this subject.
He mentioned a paper I hadn't heard of before entitled Sovereignty and the UFO (by a prof from Ohio State and one from U. of Minnesota). The paper introduces some new concepts into the UFO mess, mostly national sovereignty and how it impedes disclosure and how it might be affected by disclosure.
I am reading it this morning. You might find it interesting. See link above.
As an aside, “That UOF Podcast” is on my subscriptions list. I watch it regularly and hold it in high esteem.
One more follow-up. If I am not mistaken, it was Jacques Vallee that told Semivan about the paper I mentioned above. And it was John Mack who inspired the paper itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.