LJ: "But chemtrails? Did much research. No there there."
Got meteorology? Got Chemistry? Heavy on the science degrees in your background? Bit of military and/or aviation expertise thrown in? It would appear not.
Again, out comes your vague, lame excuse for argumentation, then imagining that your "research" not finding anything is dispositive of there actually being "no there there." You appear to think your handle and history of posting pretty pictures should persuade us not to investigate further into chemtrails.
You seem to say, "Stay stupid, FRiends! Take my word that I've done the research and there's just no there there!" Proving the non-existence of such a thing demands a far more rigorous effort.
I've got several pretty pictures, too, even a collection of chemtrail evidence. There's plenty of "there there."
No skywriter would waste his or her personal time, nor would anyone pay such a person to create patterns in the sky such as the one below if they were nonsensical, frivolous and had no expense-worthy (at thousands of dollars per hour) purpose:
An MD-83 that regularly flew a route through chemtrail residue developed a jackscrew grease issue was downed over 20 years ago (1/31/2000) near the coast of California, killing 88 passengers and crew. Despite extreme cost to life, reputation and aircraft, the government covered it up and continues with "chemtrail" experiments (though it was greatly curtailed in the Trump years).
Don't bother sharing any "more" of your self-claimedly unproductive "chemtrail research." That's apparently where there is no there.