I want him to win, too.
And I don’t want to just talk past you on the point I made, which is that he didn’t call some of these DOJ/FBI traitors in when he had the power to do so. He just talked about them and deferred repeatedly to “ongoing investigations”.
My point is not oblivious to the fact that the Senate cannot prosecute. But they can get facts out there, under oath, in order to re-direct the narrative in our favor.
When it comes to wielding power, take clues from how the dimowits do it. And then it’s use it, or lose it. And we lost it.
When it comes to wielding power, take clues from how the dimowits do it. And then it’s use it, or lose it. And we lost it.
Johnson always issued reports, appeared on countless radio programs and occasional TV to make his case ... to get the word out ... just like the Dems do. The difference is - and this is BIG - the media ignored it and undercut it and gave the other side carte blanch to attack it, and many in his own party did about the same thing. Crickets ...
I remember well one interview with Hugh Hewitt and Hewitt shouted, "Name names!" and Johnson said he couldn't because of an agreement another senator had made prior to some testimony.
His work is not easy.
“My point is not oblivious to the fact that the Senate cannot prosecute. But they can get facts out there, under oath, in order to re-direct the narrative in our favor.”
Senator Ron Johnson was the one that so unnerved Hillary! while grilling her about Benghazi that she shouted he now-famous, “At this point, what difference does it make!?!?!”
Remember THAT? He needs to use that in an ad. Not sure why he hasn’t.