Posted on 08/16/2022 9:39:23 AM PDT by ransomnote
Still doesn't change the fact your profession lied to people wholesale about COVID. Everything from the effectiveness of paper masks and quarantine, to ventilators, to death rates to the effectiveness of the so called "vaccines". "Do no harm" went right out the window when the government started offering bounties to hospitals for COVID diagnoses and ICU admissions. Your profession could have saved the country much pain and misery had you just stood up an told the government "No".
Did someone force you to get some kind of shot?
Who did? Name them naughty bastards!
When and where and by whom were you forced?
Are you now magnetic as a result?
Yep.
Amazing that anyone here would still attempt to support/defend these horrid $hots.
CDCUSGPAID, is my guess.
bookmark
My wife and I are both in our seventies....while we haven’t experienced any problems with the vaccine we are kinda worried....we both wish now we had not taken them!!!
Thousands of people were forced to take the jab or get fired from their jobs.
I don’t know where you read that, but here is a study on children and adolescents who developed carditis after vaccination:
“Our meta-analysis found that 343 patients developed carditis after the administration of 12,602,625 COVID-19 vaccination doses (pooled rate per million: 37.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.57, 59.19). The rate of carditis was higher amongst male patients (pooled rate ratio: 5.04; 95% CI 1.40, 18.19) and after the second vaccination dose (pooled rate ratio: 5.60; 95% CI 1.97, 15.89). In 301 cases of carditis (281 male; mean age: 15.90 (standard deviation [SD] 1.52) years old) reported amongst the case series/reports, 261 patients were reported to have received treatment. 97.34% of the patients presented with chest pain. The common findings include ST elevation and T wave abnormalities on electrocardiography. Oedema and late gadolinium enhancement in the myocardium were frequently observed in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). The mean length of hospital stay was 3.91 days (SD 1.75). In 298 out of 299 patients (99.67%) the carditis resolved with or without treatment.
Conclusions: Carditis is a rare complication after COVID-19 vaccination across the globe, but the vast majority of episodes are self-limiting with rapid resolution of symptoms within days. Central illustration. Balancing the benefits of vaccines on COVID-19-caused carditis and post-vaccination carditis.”
I agree vaccinating children was unnecessary, even though I know a 9-year-old girl who caught a bad case of Covid and had to be hospitalized for eight days. As you can read above, in the rare cases children develop carditis after vaccination, it quickly resolves.
Although also rare, there was much greater risk of carditis (and organ damage, including heart damage) in children who got a severe case of Covid:
Again, I am NOT saying children should have been vaccinated!
CDC Quietly Removes ‘Claim’ That Spike Protein Doesn't ‘Last Long’ in Body After COVID Vaccine
Between July 2021 and July 23, 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention made a series of changes to its “Facts about COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines,” including adding — and then removing — a statement assuring readers the mRNA and spike protein “do not last long in the body.”
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-spike-protein-mrna-covid-vaccine/?itm_term=home
...Hi troll.
What percentage of children overall got a “severe case of COVID” ?
What co-morbidities did they have?
What protocols which would have prevented progression to severe disease were specifically withheld from them?
First I don’t think k my profession lied about much. I think people didn’t want to hear what was being said and as such made political hay out of something apolitical. Have away at your opinions and wailing on the entire medical profession is certainly your right. Happy for you to seek alternative forms of treatment. But simply demanding something does not mean I am obligated to go against my judgment.
Your inflammatory language of bounties and icu admissions is fundamentally wrong. What was offered and what the talking points are of the obsessed are two different things. You could educate yourself on the issue as you are willing to accept what others say
Conflating the government with practice of medicine is two different things. I am of opinion and still maintain it as I have all all forms — fauci is an idiot. The worst of the worst. The whole government response was in appropriate in many ways.
However, the uneducated opinions of people shrieking at the top of their lungs talking points that make no sense is equally as idiotic. As for Texas gator his reasoned and analytical approach to the shrieking by the troupe of responders who haven’t had an original thought in three years and only know how to parrot blog sites that are amazingly bizarre in analysis on face value surrounded by the sycophants of the hackneyed insult and insincerely pious is on point and and devastating to their arguments.
Analysis of what actually occurred is prevailing and the truth is pretty obvious. It also is no where near what conclusions you have drawn.
Hi Q person! I see you are name calling and pinging your Special Q Thread posse again. That’s so cute and junior high of you.
If you could do math, you could figure out the percentage from my second link.
What would have prevented it? Well, according to you, that would have been your magical talisman, ivermectin! But in the real world (as opposed to Q world), according to proper studies, it only b would have helped if the children were infested with intestinal roundworms. Then it really does make a difference.
You are welcome. If you need help with the math, let us know.
“I learn a lot from your analysis. It is always well reasoned. I just can’t get my head around how people see a result and work backwards to the hypothesis of their choice. Instead of drawn conclusions based on data analysis.”
Thank you.
I don’t know if the authors believe what they write but they know how to make money playing into people’s desire to have their convictions reinforced.
I’d like to add a “well done” to your posts as well. It’s nice to see a Real Scientist here for a change.
“I’d like to add a “well done” to your posts as well. It’s nice to see a Real Scientist here for a change.”
Engineer!
Thanks. I haven’t read your posts previously but I see you have been honored as the designated troll on this thread.
Engineers are definitely Real Scientists. I ought to know as I’m the daughter of one.
High-dose vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine, frequent nebulizing with hydrogen peroxide, would all have helped, in addition to Ivermectin.
You’re lying as usual.
The reference to the percentages was rhetorical.
I never bothered to read your article: because, coming from you, I knew it was propaganda. Just like your snide comments about Ivermectin and Q world.
Other countries besides the US have had amazing success with Ivermectin: not in some measly Pfauci-pfunded “study” but at the population level.
Sod off.
Oh really? What countries?
Read later.
You mean like the University of London epidemiologist who was predicting 10s of millions dead from COVID, and recommended lockdowns while he snuck off to bang his mistress?
You mean like "safe and effective" with the quoted efficacy rate dropping from the mid-90s to the 30s ("those Beagles had it coming")?
Or Birx admitting she knew jabbing does not matter, before the jabbing started?
Or the fact the HHS and CDC knew of OTC medications which was used originally for sickle-cell anemia, that saved 85% of people who were on freaking VENTILATORS?
Or the use of Remdesivir ("RunDeathIsNear") despite the fact it was pulled from a study on Ebola, because it was so harmful? How bad does it have to be that letting Ebola progress was considered preferable to giving it?
Get wrecked, troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.