Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Ally Says He Knows What the FBI Was Looking for in Mar-a-Lago Raid
PJ Media ^ | 8/13/2022 | Victoria Taft

Posted on 08/14/2022 8:29:17 AM PDT by Signalman

he lead investigator in the House of Representatives committee on the Trump Russia hoax says he knows why the FBI raided former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, and it didn’t have anything to do with scary-sounding “classified documents relating to nuclear weapons,” as the DOJ got The Washington Post to spread on its behalf.

Kash Patel believes something more is afoot than a beef between Trump, the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

The former federal national security prosecutor and Trump Administration Chief of Staff for the Department of Defense believes the FBI raided Trump’s resort to seek and destroy any documents related to the Trump-Russia hoax — Russiagate — that Trump had previously declassified back in 2020 and 2021.

The former federal prosecutor told Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum that Donald Trump issued “sweeping declassification orders” in 2020 and 2021, including the Russiagate and Hillary Clinton email investigation documents.

Patel says he believes the FBI wants to scrub all of the documents approving the Hillary Clinton election scam about Trump being a Russian secret agent. The FBI, Department of Justice, Perkins Coie law firm, Fusion GPS, and CIA knew the Russiagate narrative was a Hillary Clinton-approved hoax but put their offices in the service of pushing it and “investigating” it to keep Trump out of the White House. Now they’re back to do it again in 2024.

On his Truth Social account, Patel wrote, “DOJ and FBI – and vindictive librarians at NARA – continue to perpetuate the Russia hoax by ‘seizing’ documents that President Trump declassified and the American people need to see. … Bottom line, they never want you to see their corrupt Russia Gate documents and will use any and all power to keep them from the American people.”

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: creepstate; deepstate; districtofcolumbia; doj; jeffbezos; kashpatel; kashyappatel; maralagoraid; nara; patel; perkinscoie; pjmedia; policestate; russiacollusionhoax; russiagate; russiahoax; singlepartystate; trumpally; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last
To: Not A Snowbird

“I’ll bet he (or a trusted ally) has copies.”

The day he declassified everything he should’ve published everything himself. He was waiting for DOJ to do it — and they never would do that.

Big mistake. Huge.


101 posted on 08/14/2022 10:15:49 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Sometimes when you get to where you're supposed to be, it's too soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
On RSBN his attorney described it as “broad and vague”.

Obviously I have no experience of US federal search warrants, but given the fact that they asked to be allowed to search for every kind of document (or item) that PDJT had been in contact with during his whole presidency, is there any other way to characterize it?

102 posted on 08/14/2022 10:17:05 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I hope President Trump made back-up copies and has them stashed somewhere safe.


103 posted on 08/14/2022 10:18:25 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Disband and Defund the putrid FBI. America does not need an out of control Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Please, see my post #36 with links or HotTabasco #78.

In short, PDJT declassified the documents but Bill Barr appointed Durham special investigator, which made the documents part of an ongoing (very slow) federal investigation and can not therefore be made public.

Your guess if that was intentional or not.


104 posted on 08/14/2022 10:22:09 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

I subsequently read that, but that debunks the idea that the FIBs were trying to suppress documents that would incriminate their masters. If Durham already has those documents, there is no way that rifling through Melania’s bras and panties would suppress anything. If Trump is suing them, his lawyer has those documents, too.

The most this despicable raid could do is intimidate Trump. And we know the man. He doesn’t do being intimidated. Certainly not by these low life errand boys. Of course, they might have planted something.


105 posted on 08/14/2022 10:22:36 AM PDT by ToxicMasculinity (At this point, what difference does it make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Looks to me that it’s the DOJ that’s doing the obstructing by slow walking. They’ve been doing it for years now. It’s not Trump. This raid was part of the DOJ obstruction and cover-up.


106 posted on 08/14/2022 10:27:31 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMasculinity
I am sure the DOJ were after the original unredacted documents. They will claim that showing them, using then, copying them is obstruction of justice (re Durham investigation), one of the laws they cited to be able to get the warrant. Of course Trump's legal team have options, but it will make everything much more difficult for them.
107 posted on 08/14/2022 10:29:15 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Thank you for getting to the point without a lot of “breaking!, bombshell!, must see/hear/watch this 29 minute video after three ads!, TURN UP YOUR VOLUME “.


108 posted on 08/14/2022 10:29:55 AM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

He should have. IF he didn’t, then that was DUMB!


109 posted on 08/14/2022 10:31:02 AM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Durham has to have them. He’s got the security clearance, and he’s a top lawyer. How do you go to trial without full knowledge of the case.


110 posted on 08/14/2022 10:31:46 AM PDT by ToxicMasculinity (At this point, what difference does it make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

The guy David, on X22report still says Durham is legit and is working to expose the deep state.


111 posted on 08/14/2022 10:36:12 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Upon close inspection it occurs to me that that just might be a joke. Seriously.

Nuh-uh. My wife’s best friend’s cousin has a brother-in-law whose silly second ex-wife removed a tag, and the fire department showed up before the house burnt down!


112 posted on 08/14/2022 10:36:41 AM PDT by drSteve78 (Je suis Deplorable STILL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMasculinity

I am sure he does, but as Sundance @ ConservativeTreeHouse has written many times, how do you prosecute this case without showing that Mueller and DOJ was involved in the Russia Hoax?

Unless you do not want to win the case you cannot. And therefore the only people going to be prosecuted will be very peripheral individuals such as Klinesmith (convicted and given a very light slap on the wrist) or some of HRC’s lawyers (acquitted).

I am sorry; Durham, has had the case for about two years now, and not much is happening. Don’t think we will see anything prior 2024.


113 posted on 08/14/2022 10:37:58 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

bkmk


114 posted on 08/14/2022 10:43:21 AM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

No. No other way to describe it.

Interesting because I read and watch a lot of true crime, and it seems the warrants have to be ridiculously targeted and specific as to what they’re looking for before a judge will sign them. And if they happen to stumble on to something incriminating that isn’t listed in the warrant, they can’t take it.

“Vague” = anything and everything, IMO. A free-for-all wilding.


115 posted on 08/14/2022 10:48:22 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Sometimes when you get to where you're supposed to be, it's too soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: virgil

I hope that’s not the case but actually wouldn’t be surprised if true. In a weird way Durham reminds me of John Bolton with the stern look and both are likely neo cons.


116 posted on 08/14/2022 10:48:29 AM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
"The lead investigator in the House of Representatives committee on the Trump Russia hoax says he knows why the FBI raided former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, and it didn’t have anything to do with scary-sounding “classified documents relating to nuclear weapons,”"

I partially agree. I think this operation might be a two-fer operation carried out on two fronts -- criminally charge Trump for mishandling classified docs and also reclassify and retrieve docs that expose dem corruption, e.g.. Russiagate. The classified docs angle is misdirection but also useful in its own right to damage Trump politically.

Even if the dems don't ultimately prevail I don't think they see much downside in criminally charging Trump. They have full cover by the MSM.

The misdirection reminds me of the magic trick scene in Mission Impossible with the disk. "While I was up here ... you were down there".


117 posted on 08/14/2022 10:54:16 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMasculinity

This 🎯


118 posted on 08/14/2022 11:01:21 AM PDT by M_Continuum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

“Upon close inspection it occurs to me that that just might be a joke. Seriously.”

Seriously, it perpetuates a stupid myth.


119 posted on 08/14/2022 11:21:18 AM PDT by TexasGator (ice )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

You left out the so-called ‘media’ aka their propaganda organs.


120 posted on 08/14/2022 11:41:56 AM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson