The question is not "Is Geospatial Data with Cellphones Precise?"
The question is "How precise was the specific Geospatial data purchsed by True The Vote."
See my links in post #31. In his interview with Philip Bump, D'Souza accepted the 100 foot number provided by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.
I have heard Catherine say the distance was closer to a meter. Why are you so fixated on the distance ignoring the other variables, which taken together are conclusive. These data are accepted as evidence in courts, yet we allow the Left and the MSM to dismiss the data. Try Googling 2000 mules and you will get a list of articles debunking it. Same with Bing. Big Tech is using algorithms to bias the search.
“Of course, there are ways to eliminate passers-by and county workers, of course, there are ways to confirm that the people in the videos are (or are not) mules. Larry Campbell, dropping off 6 ballots for his big family, wouldn’t be in our study. Going once to a dropbox wasn’t in our study. Our mules averaged 38 dropbox visits and 8 NGO visits. Any other combination (ex. going to NGOs and USPS boxes, for example, wouldn’t have been in our study. Or going to 100 dropboxes, but no NGOs. They weren’t in our study.) That’s how we know this is the tip of the iceberg.”
The numbers are stunning when the minimum criteria of 10 drop boxes, with 5 visits and a handful of ballots delivered per visit, are considered. By that calculus, it is a potential 380,000 illegal votes. When those criteria are lowered to fewer dropboxes and visits, another 810,000 illegal votes. In Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, the mules allegedly cast more than enough illegal votes to overcome the margin of defeat for Trump.